Opinions about the Chick 2022

ChooChooSnakeMan

Active member
Ok, I hope this starts a lively discussion. For me 2022 on the Chick was kind of disappointing and I've seen many posts that echo that. Maybe for you it was your best year ever! Anyway I invite you to post how you would grade Chickamauga bass fishing or for that matter fishing in general for 2022, list the species that you base your grade on. For example Bass or maybe Bass and Crappie or Catfish and Bluegill.

A = Better than ever or really, really good year
B = Pretty good, maybe down a little from what you're used to the last several years on Chickamauga
C = Not so good, down a lot
D = Really not good, down to the point that you started going less or started going to another lake
F = Forget it, Chickamauga totally was a waste of time for me in 2022 compared to previous years

It would be good if when you turn in your grade if you also give us your opinion about why Chickamauga earned the grade you gave it.

I'll start:

Grade = 'C'
Species - Primarily Bass but also crappie and bluegill
Reasons other than maybe I don't know what I'm doing:) are: I think the enormous fishing pressure has caught up to the lake and the crazy spring we had in 2022 with rain, temps, and water flow hurt the prime time fishing (for me) and the spawn.

Thanks in advance for your posts and opinions!
 

FishingwithRusty

Active member
C from me, definitely think the pressure has gotten to this lake, it fishes so small.
 
Unfortunately a D for me. Fish alone quite a bit and got to the point I wasn’t looking forward to it. Always nice being in the water but the tough trips just wore me down.
 

alicia ayers

New member
F forget it!!! was definitely a waste of time in summer and fall and not even going now ! Was great in spring when all the new grass came in , caught a lot , just nothing over 6 lbs this year , and that's saying a lot for me. I can usually manage to catch an 8 lber at least . I think way too many txs. and way too much spraying to kill the grass . I usually am fishing from the banks or docks , and saw all kinds of dead fish floating everywhere after the weekends . Once the summer heat hit , I pretty much was over it , and now , no water left to fish in so will just wait till spring and hope it will be better than this year .
 

Fshn Cpa

Active member
C for me. fish mostly from the power plant to the dam. Caught some every once in a while but had a lot of zero to three fish days.
 

elwestb

Active member
I have to give it a C also.
 
Seems the consensus is this past year was down for most. How do we reverse the trend or do you think it’s the new normal of the chick?
 

ChooChooSnakeMan

Active member
Thanks for the replies everyone. I honestly am a little surprised at the average low score. Seems like right now it's a C- for the Chick. Hopefully a lot more people will post a score and reason why. I think Chickamauga has dipped for sure but hopefully it isn't the beginning of a long steady decline. The tremendous fishing pressure had to take a toll, I know we all hoped it wouldn't but it does seem clear that something prompted the decline and the pressure and maybe unstable water levels and temps in 2022 didn't help. Anyway this is interesting reading and I hope more will post what they think.
 

billyc

Member
I would rate it at a D at best. Two factors I think cause most of it . Florida bass become more aware of fishing pressure according to biologists. We have a collection of guides that have absolutely pillaged this lake for their profit because they guide their clients on the same places other anglers have fished for years and when you go back there the area is dead. When an area of the lake gets hot watch out the guides will swoop in and pound it to death until someone else finds fish and then the process repeats.
 

drdetroit

Member
The internet does not help! Every report, picture or video does not help. Look at the license plates in the parking area.</p>

</p>Dr Detroit
 

ChooChooSnakeMan

Active member
drdetroit - 11/16/2022 8:37 PM



The internet does not help! Every report, picture or video does not help. Look at the license plates in the parking area.</p>

 </p>Dr Detroit 

Agree, the publicity of Chickamauga being featured in Bassmaster magazine's top 100 lakes as just one example surely brought a lot of visitors. It is a two edged sword. If you owned a tackle store or campground, or any of the many businesses positively impacted by all the people who came here to fish you would feel that publicity was a great thing. If your living was made guiding people on the lake you would want the word to get out. I know back several years ago when I fished the CFF events with Jmax we were fishing in an area and most all of the boats we came upon had Kentucky decals so the lake has been hammered for years by out of town anglers and a lot of it is organized groups. The fact is that for those of us who just fish, we want a world class fishery but we want it kept secret. I think there has to be a balance, I don't know what the answer is and I hate a lot of government rules. I've seen ideas such as have a tournament permit system lake wide to limit the number of events and to raise funds for fish habitat enhancements. That all sounds good to a point but should the government be able to tell a bass club they can't hold an event on public waters when they want to? Then there is the problem of once a system is created for example to regulate and police the number of tournaments you have to have the infrastructure to do just those things which creates another government excuse for a department with employees and costs for someone to pay. Hard questions for sure.
 

WaterChap

Member
The Spring was maybe a B- for me. D- for the rest of the year. Thought it was just me. Agree with Alicia. The spraying can’t be good. The lake does fish pretty small as Rusty pointed out. I suspect the fish are there but have become very conditioned to the pressure (Billy). I don’t think we could every regulate every club that fishes on the lake, but perhaps we could set up a permit system for tournaments over a certain size. I say “we” meaning, I have no idea who would have authority over that but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t care what I think!
 

Cstick1

New member
They were spraying the lake when it was one of the best in the country so whats the difference now?


WaterChap - 11/19/2022 11:15 PM

The Spring was maybe a B- for me. D- for the rest of the year. Thought it was just me. Agree with Alicia. The spraying can’t be good. The lake does fish pretty small as Rusty pointed out. I suspect the fish are there but have become very conditioned to the pressure (Billy). I don’t think we could every regulate every club that fishes on the lake, but perhaps we could set up a permit system for tournaments over a certain size. I say “we” meaning, I have no idea who would have authority over that but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t care what I think!
 

WaterChap

Member
You may be right, but spraying around the park certainly kills the fishing for the bank fishermen. I don’t have data on fish catches correlated with defoliant sprayed into the water. I’m guessing that the effect wouldn’t be immediate, but would take a few seasons to really show the effects. An instant effect would produce floating fish in large numbers. One of the reasons that Florida bass have flourished here is the vegetation. The more we remove, the less they will thrive. And that assumes that there are no long term effects of defoliant spraying on fish (or people!). I know that Agent Orange and Round-Up are perfectly safe, but who knows about what they’re putting in the water now? It’s probably safe. Defoliants generally are. Nothing to worry about….
 
Top