</p>TubbyTN - 10/4/2015 7:37 PM if the buckeyes played in the sec they would lose 3 or 4 games per year
</p>Treadftheyin - 11/30/2015 7:40 AM What was that undefeated? More like overrated!
Treadfin - 11/30/2015 11:05 AM
They got beat by the only real team they have played
Carl Guffey - 11/30/2015 10:03 PM
<font face="georgia,palatino" size="3">You get ranked when you beat the numbers 1 and 2 team in the country in two weeks, win a national championship and return a bunch of starters. Until you get beat, the bad thing is they could still wind up in the top four.</font>
I agree. If you cant win your conference you should not be in the mix for a National Championship.GAfisherman - 12/1/2015 8:29 PM
Carl Guffey - 11/30/2015 10:03 PM
<font face="georgia,palatino" size="3">You get ranked when you beat the numbers 1 and 2 team in the country in two weeks, win a national championship and return a bunch of starters. Until you get beat, the bad thing is they could still wind up in the top four.</font>
Haha let it go. Won't happen.
BulletTJ - 12/1/2015 2:55 PM
What I really find funny is now some of Ohio States players are talking trash about AL and the strength of schedule. If I were the Buckeyes I would do everything I could to change the subject of strength of schedule. I heard they were thinking about scheduling Marion County for next year but they decided not to. Seems they werent sure they could beat them. I agree with the playing in a meat grinder comment. You really dont need depth if you have a cream puff schedule and could take your starters out after the first quarter. They only reason the Buckeyes dont do that is they like to run the score up on a team if they can. I guess you have to do something to try and offset the cream puff games. It would be nice to only have one or two top 25 teams on your schedule and still get ranked in the top ten.