WaterChap
Well-known member
So I am in the extreme preliminary stages of buying another used boat (probably likely as not I'll keep what I got), and I'm wondering about the whole issue of compression. It seems that checking compression is a little bit harder on an outboard than on a car engine, so maybe I could do it. But as I have been researching I'm starting to wonder why I would bother.
First, if the compression on an engine is bad, it is very likely something non-catastrophic, such as carbon build up. I'm pretty sure my compression would have been pretty dodgy when I first bought my boat, but dozens of cans of Seafoam later, she runs pretty good.
Second, if the compression's bad the engine will run bad. It'll either be radically underpowered or it will idle very rough. If that's the case, why not just run the boat? What is the magic that a compression test gets you?
I'm hoping for something a little more specific than, "well you can do what you want but I always test compression," or "if you don't test compression, you're an idiot." I'm an idiot way before the compression issue and I tend to get skeptical when I can't see the point of a bunch of work. Thoughts anyone?
First, if the compression on an engine is bad, it is very likely something non-catastrophic, such as carbon build up. I'm pretty sure my compression would have been pretty dodgy when I first bought my boat, but dozens of cans of Seafoam later, she runs pretty good.
Second, if the compression's bad the engine will run bad. It'll either be radically underpowered or it will idle very rough. If that's the case, why not just run the boat? What is the magic that a compression test gets you?
I'm hoping for something a little more specific than, "well you can do what you want but I always test compression," or "if you don't test compression, you're an idiot." I'm an idiot way before the compression issue and I tend to get skeptical when I can't see the point of a bunch of work. Thoughts anyone?