Clausen DQ'd - What is "Getting Information"

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

rsimms

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
6,784
Location
Chattanooga
I find this controversy over Luke Clausen being DQ'd from last week’s Elite Series event at Wheeler Lake very interesting. It is hard to know all the details, but based on what I read I must wonder, How do you define 'Getting information?"

In this day and age it seems virtually impossible for any angler to be 100% buffered from getting some sort of information about tournament waters or the fishing in advance. And then having to get through a random polygraph test. I have to agree with Clausen... it does sort of seem like a "moving target."

Based on what little I've been able to read (below), I agree that a DQ in this case is a bit harsh. What do you think?

----------

B.A.S.S. upholds Clausen DQ

Luke Clausen’s appeal of his disqualification following day 3 of last week’s Elite Series event at Wheeler Lake was denied Friday afternoon by a three-person panel, which needed just about an hour to issue a ruling.

With the appeals panel’s ruling, Clausen’s total catch of 59-09, initially good for 8th place, is erased, dropping him to 108th in the tournament. Cliff Crochet, who finished 7th with 59-10, will remain in that position, and each angler below 7th will move up one position.

Clausen, who qualified for the Elite Series in 2016 after competing on the FLW Tour for the past 12 years, appeared via conference call for today’s hearing. Afterward, the ruling stunned him.

“This is the first time I’ve ever been disqualified or protested,” he told BassFan after being informed of the panel’s decision by B.A.S.S. official Chris Bowes. “This is pretty painful out of pride and it’s embarrassing. I definitely follow the rules very closely and this is something I feel is unjust.”

Clausen said he asked for an explanation of the committee’s decision, but wasn’t given one.

“All Bowes told me was that it wasn’t an easy decision and that some of the evidence resonated more with them and that’s what they came up with,” Clausen said.

B.A.S.S. circulated a seven-paragraph press release about the ruling, but declined to comment further on the matter.

The panel consisted of two tournament anglers not competing in the Elite Series and a B.A.S.S. employee not associated with the tournament department. This is the second time in as many years that an Elite Series angler has appealed a disqualification. Last year, Mike Kernan was successful in having his DQ at the Sabine River overturned.

Clausen was disqualified for violating Elite Series Rule C3, which outlines a number of restrictions on practicing and obtaining information during off-limits periods, among others.

The violation was uncovered after Clausen failed a truth-verification test last Saturday. When pressed by B.A.S.S. officials for additional details at the time, Clausen revealed that over dinner following day 1 of the tournament, a friend who was reading blog entries as part of Bassmaster.com’s coverage of the event began asking Clausen if he had fished around other competitors who were pictured on the blog or if Clausen knew where they were fishing.

“He’s a fan of the sport,” Clausen said. “He’s from Alabama, but hadn’t fished the lake in a while. He was just curious.”

Clausen insists he did not solicit or seek any information from his friend, who appeared as a witness on Clausen’s behalf today. Clausen said in light of today’s ruling, he’s not sure how to interpret what is considered “getting information.”

“If a buddy of mine back home who’s never been to the state of Alabama calls me and says I should be throwing a ChatterBait because they’re eating it at home, is that getting information?” he asked. “I don’t know where the line is. I don’t feel like I crossed it. There was no malice or intent.”

Clausen said in preparation for the hearing, he recalled additional encounters he’d had with other people related to the Wheeler Lake event. He told the panel today that a man at Walmart the morning before a tournament day suggested he fish a specific creek because the man’s brother had caught fish there before. In addition, Clausen said he encountered a man who told him there’s a 5-pounder under his dock. In both instances, Clausen said, the information was unsolicited.

“There’s a constant stream of information,” he said. “By a literal interpretation of the rule, everybody should be DQ’d. I’m just dumbfounded.”

He also submitted to another polygraph – at his own expense – after returning home to Washington this week and passed it. He submitted those results as evidence today, but felt the panel dismissed them.

Clausen said he’s passed all of the polygraph exams he’d taken during his career before last week.

“I’ve never been concerned about (breaking) the rules,” he said.

The DQ virtually eliminates Clausen from contention for next year's Classic, as he now has three finishes of 82nd or lower in the four events that have been staged thus far.

Read more: http://www.bassfan.com/docktalk_article/15505/b-a-s-s-upholds-clausen-dq#.Vy3Wznog3GB#ixzz47yCtUGnu
 
There's definitely a huge grey area here that BASS needs to clarify. These pros are running into locals at ramps constantly & many are offering info. Guess all these guys are going to have to do like Dave Lefebre & Shaw Grigsby when I met them at ramps. They just told me when we shook hands, "I don't want to be rude, but I can't talk about or listen to anything about what the fish are doing here".
 
Was the polygraph given to all competitors or just Clausen? If so, what did BASS hear or see that initially elicited suspicion?
 
jason - 5/7/2016 11:23 AM

Was the polygraph given to all competitors or just Clausen? If so, what did BASS hear or see that initially elicited suspicion?

From an earlier story I read that he was simply pulled from the weigh-in line for a "random check (polygraph exam)," and failed a question or two. I gather that it's sort of like at the airport security checkpoint... they just do occasional "random checks," and he got tagged.
 
As someone who use to have to take polygraphs on a regular basis getting hit with a surprise one out of the blue can be unnerving and can actually make someone so nervous that true answers will read as lies. Should have done more investigation before just hitting the guy with a DQ
 
BASS events are almost not even fun to fish anymore. I know in the college tournaments they spend 30 minutes telling you how easily they will DQ you. It makes you nervous, I couldn't imagine getting hit with a random polygraph.
 
It's crazy they won't tell him exactly why he failed! When I was interviewed for a job at the xxxxxxx police department the second test I had was a polygraph. I passed the entire polygraph except for one question... They asked me if I had ever sold, bought, or smoked marijuana... I said "no".... Later after the test they said I had failed to pass that one single question but still passed the polygraph interview. The interesting part is that I have never delt with marijuana in my life; yet, they said I had. So I'm a firm believer that the polygraph test are not 100% accurate! However, it is a double edge sword. I'm positive people who have done wrong can still pass a polygraph. It is not like the movies where the polygraph is the ultimate snitch on yourself tool.

Funny thing is though they still tried to hire me...
 
Every one of the major tx tours have rules about aquiring inforamtion that isnt available to everyone. Blogs and fishing report websites like this one get viewed by all of the competitiors I would imagine. Also, I have seen myself how locals will just volunteer random info to pros when they come to town. It would be hard for a touring pro to go around wearing hearing protection when they come to town, but this ruling makes me think they are going to have to isolate them selves to prevent it. My guess is either someone with a big feather in their hat at BASS or another influencial angler has it out for Clausen....they all get as much info as they can and I dont blame them, their livelyhood is at stake and this may cost Clausen more than just his points for this event.
 
Trip Weldon would not have d q'd him without substantial evidence. I think the polygraph was brought in for good reason. Yes it is entirely possible it was an inadvertent mistake he made and still doesn't know what it was. That's unfair!
 
I feel worse for Randy Haynes's dq ! After the prop hub spin, he rode in with someone from the bass press crew. Not some random boater from outside the tournament! BASS needs to look at a rule change there, IMO.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top