Well I read through it and thought it was old news but interesting. I have had actual experience with running these test back in the day. From past experience I can deduce a couple things. One is that all these quick test are great. They are truly wonderful, but waaaaaaaaay to primitive compared to the analytical monster of machines we have now. It seems we are rushing things too much. Even these comments on this site. The second thing I want to get out there is that I believe people that have died were falsely labeled as covid 19 deaths. This has been proven, so dying hospitals can get more funding. But going back to the testing in the article, they never once mentioned anything about ‘tagging’. What’s in the article, is not really in depth of what’s actually going on. Basically to sum up the whole article for everyone that just wants to read this post know that the Sub mental scientist are using a test that basically will just tell if you have a virus.... that’s it. It’s a great way to full the masses . You can ask anyone in their 50s or older that back when HIV hit hard in America they thought everyone was gonna die. And I mean everyone. That’s because they were using a test that just showed if you had a virus. These ‘Marker’ style test are never accurate. The only way to be sure is to tag a known virus and then run it against that on the proper analytical machines. This is why they grow viruses in labs. In summary, I agree with most of the article. There are people out there that get fooled by what they think is a sciencyyy stuff but in reality it’s just elementary at best. It’s like taking a test for someone who is colorblind. It’s great and all but what kind of color blindness do you have. See what I mean. Lastly let me say my heart goes out to anyone that has fallen to covid-19 but I believe a lot of this has been blown out of proportion. If this was Something like small pox; however, it would truly be a difficult situation.