Florida Bass Study on Chickamauga

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

Carl Guffey

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
2,463
Location
Friendsville, TN
<h2>Latest Florida Bass Study on Chickamauga Lake Indicates Success, but with Surprising Results</h2><div class="content clear-block">

NASHVILLE --- Results of three genetic studies conducted on Florida largemouth bass released into Chickamauga Lake have all revealed some positive news for bass anglers, but with results that might be surprising, according to the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. </p>

TWRA Fisheries Division Chief, Bobby Wilson, made an in depth presentation on the subject during the December meeting of the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission. </p>

Largemouth bass collections by TWRA fish crews in 2010 and again in 2012 indicated the successful integration of Florida bass, the southern strain of largemouth, into the lake’s largemouth population. This past spring, the agency removed genetic samples from 50 trophy-sized largemouth bass caught by local anglers and tournament competitors.</p>

Nearly all the fish were either a hybrid where the southern strain of fish had crossed with Tennessee’s native northern bass; or they were later generations of largemouth known by biologists as backcrosses. </p>

None of the trophy fish from 2013, many eight pounds or larger, were the pure southern or northern strain of bass.</p>

“We are excited about the results of the Chickamauga Lake Florida Bass Project,” said Wilson. “Our original goal was to increase the percentage of Florida bass genes to 15 percent and it is currently about 45 percent, but more importantly these stockings have led to a significant increase in the number of larger bass in the lake.”</p>

Wilson credited local anglers and bass tournament directors for their participation in the TWRA study and their desire to see a trophy bass fishery on a lake where reservoir conditions have also likely helped produce headline-making catches from Chickamauga.</p>

Of the 50 angler-caught largemouth sampled this year, 75 percent were hybrids and 25 percent were backcrosses, according to TWRA Reservoir Biologist Mike Jolley. Jolley headed all of the studies on Chickamauga. </p>

“A backcross is created when hybrids or their offspring spawn with a pure Florida or pure northern strain of bass,” explained Jolley. “Interestingly, the pure Florida largemouth bass was not observed at all, which has been the common theme throughout this project. Hardly any pure Florida bass have been collected during any of our samples.”</p>

While hybrids dominated the total number of fish that anglers caught for the 2013 genetic study, it was the backcrosses that dominated the agency’s collection of bass in 2010 and 2012 through electro fishing methods.</p>

“Hybrids, which are thought to have more vigor and better growth rates, made up the majority of the big fish and were confirmed to have superior growth rates verses the native northern strain,” said Jolley, explaining why it was not surprising that a large percentage of the angler-caught fish were hybrids.</p>

Bass collected during TWRA electrofishing studies represented a much wider range of bass sizes. However, every study indicated satisfying progress toward trophy bass management.</p>

“Hybrids in the Chickamauga bass population have demonstrated better growth rates when compared to the native northern strain of bass,” said Jolley.</p>

While the release of some two million southern strain of bass since the year 2000 have indeed indicated Florida bass can provide a boost to Chickamauga, not all reservoirs are created equally for trophy bass management, emphasized Jolley.</p>

“Contributing factors have likely helped with the success of this program on Chickamauga,” said the biologist. “It is a large reservoir, with good aquatic vegetation, ample forage base, adequate size limits on bass, and consistent natural reproduction of bass. All of that has helped create a perfect storm for this very good outcome.”</p>

While the TWRA wants to help maintain a trophy bass fishery on Chickamauga, limited hatchery space, limited sources of Florida Bass from other states, and the limiting factors on other reservoirs across the state will determine if and where other southern strain bass might eventually be introduced.</p>

“When we started stocking Florida bass into Chickamauga more than 10 years ago we announced then that everyone needs to understand that there are limitations to where and how many fish we can stock in other bodies of water,” said Wilson. “That still holds true today.”</p></div>
 
Pretty cool to read about how the Florida Bass are changing the Chick.I personally have seen and benefited from what TWRA has done to build such a great fishery .The last 3 years has been the best big fish producing years that I have ever had out of the last 20 years I have fished
on the Chick.
 
H-1 - 1/21/2015 6:04 PM

......I personally have seen and benefited from what TWRA has done to build such a great fishery .The last 3 years has been the best big fish producing years that I have ever had out of the last 20 years I have fished
on the Chick.
TWRA can not / should not take credit for favorable weather and flows, particular during the spawn. While I agree with you the that the fishing is hot on Chick, the reason is mother nature has been good to us, not agency works. Throw a string of cold winters and poor spawns in a row and one will see the blame game come out in full force.
 
"with good aquatic vegetation" should have been in bold letters and underlined for emphasis.Without it the forage base for these monsters will decrease and our fishery will suffer. Many thanks to TWRA and the persistent anglers that pushed for the program many years ago.
 
No doubt TWRA and the biologists know what they are doing. Read a report and be introduced to science. Find it very interesting on the variables and statistics they use or rely upon. They do a lot of work for our benefit....
 
Fuzzy - 1/21/2015 8:35 PM

No doubt TWRA and the biologists know what they are doing. Read a report and be introduced to science. Find it very interesting on the variables and statistics they use or rely upon. They do a lot of work for our benefit....
Unfortunately that is not the case with this. Early funding was by anglers. Consequences of stocking a non-native strain were only theorized when the stocking began, the results of which are just now being started to be studied. Long term affects are unknown, especially when you consider other influences such as Alabama bass, northern spotted bass, meanmouth (ie spot/smallie hybrid) gene potential introductions. So far variables and statistics have been ignored. Environmental factors (particularly spring water levels, summertime flows, and mild winters) of the early 80's boom have been similar to the most recent incline in population size structure so much so, that IMO, that the current trophy sized bass would be there regardless of which strain. The 3 environmental factors I mentioned above also coincide with vigorous weed growth, however it just a byproduct of the conditions, not a cause of the boom of the trophy fishery, again IMO. TWRA does do lots for our benefit, but this stocking move was purely motivated by money/politics.
 
<font size="3" face="georgia,palatino">The current fishing quality on Chickamuga is due to TWRA persistence in stocking Florida Strain on a regular basis since 2000. All of the potential introduction problems had surfaced in multiple studies since the 1980's.</font></p>

<font size="3" face="Georgia">As from the most recent study there are no "pure" florida strain in attendance. To have a persistent supply of F1's and F2's there has to be a constant supply of pure Florida strain to maintain the fishery. Or as stated in numerous studies the fishery will return to the genes that are best adapted to survive the waterway conditions. Which were already in attendance. The advantage of "hybrid vigor" of the F1 cross between Northern and Florida Bass may well provide the next Tennesse State weight record.</font></p>

<font size="3" face="Georgia">Case on Point:</font></p>

<font size="3" face="Georgia">The state of Indiana did a study on Florida Bass in Northern waters. Indiana had three ponds. Pond 1 had Florida Bass only. Pond 2 had the F1 crosses of Florida strain and Northern Strain. Pond 3 had all Northern strain fish. The fish were left for several years with no new introductions. At the end of the study pond 1 had stunted florida strain, but pure stock. Pond 3 had all normal Northern strain. In pond 2, all of the fish had reverted to fish resembling Northern strain. The genes were present to let the fish with the best qualities to survive the conditionsand they did.</font></p>

<font size="3" face="Georgia">If you appreciate the Chickamauga fishery? Thank TWRA</font></p>
 
Outbreeding depression vs over-dominance hypothesis (ie hybrid vigor)....in the long term outbreeding depression tends to be stronger
 
I have hear they are also considering trying the same thing on other reservoirs, hopefully one near me!!!!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top