There is just NO way to tax fairly. All of our arguments are really about what each of us thinks is the LEAST unfair method.
Perhaps you like a flat percentage so everyone pays, say 15% no matter how much they need just to live on? How about having all pay the same number of dollars because they all have access to the same community roads, police, courts, etc.? Do you think that a progressive tax is best where some pay more for the same services just because they earn more? Maybe a national sales tax where those who spend the most pay the most? There are a lot more ideas than these that people think may work. Then there are the combinations of tax methods that could also work, BUT....
Each of them is patently unfair to someone, somehow.
What I think we really need to argue is how do we get the government budgets to where we can pay for what we need to be doing and at the same time pay what we have already spent that we don't even have. I don't know nearly enough about the budget (nor do I think anyone else knows) to have the faintest idea as to what effect different cuts would truly have. I only know that an awful lot of areas in the budget will have to suffer serious cuts or eliminations for us to come close in the forseeable future. Let's determine how much is going to be necessary (not just a good thing to do or to have, pretty much all of our programs are that in one way or another) before we try to decide who of us is going to pay how much. I am really, really scared!