Looks like it's our fault

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

Bubbakat

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,112
Location
McMinnville Tn.
Read this slowly, let it sink in, then VOTE in November

This is about as clear and easy to understand as it can be please read the entire article.



The article below is completely neutral, not anti republican or democrat.


Charlie Reese, a retired reporter for the Orlando Sentinel has hit the nail directly on the head, defining clearly who it is that in the final analysis must assume responsibility for the judgments made that impact each one of us every day.


It's a short but good read. Worth the time. Worth remembering!

545 vs. 300,000,000


EVERY CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE. READ IT AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.


Charley Reese has been a journalist for 49 years.


545 PEOPLE -- By Charlie Reese


Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.


Have you ever wondered , if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?


Have you ever wondered , if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?


You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.


You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.


You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.


You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.


You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.


One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.


I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.


I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.


Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.


What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits... The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.


The Constitution , which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi . She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.


It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace

545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.


If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.


If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red ..


If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ.



If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.


There are no insoluble government problems.


Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.


Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.


They, and they alone, have the power..


They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.


Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...


We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
 
Bubba...how long before you get a "it's Bush's fault"? LOL I agree tho...VOTE THEM OUT!!!!!
 
What makes you think the ones you vote in will be any better than the ones you vote out? And don't say they can't be any worse......... because they can be worse. Be careful what you ask for..... you just might get it.
 
I believe that they should impliment term limits on every one of them not just the pres. It seems like they feel that they can't be touched and can run the country the way they want and that the american people don't matter if we would all stick together as a nation and a united people and do something along the lines of what just took place with the mayor of chattanooga it would put the fear back into these people and make them realize that they work for us and not the other way around. jmo
 
Your RIGHT outcaster....the current President is a PRIME example. Just glad that I didn't vote for him!
 
outcaster - 9/14/2010 7:28 PM What makes you think the ones you vote in will be any better than the ones you vote out? And don't say they can't be any worse......... because they can be worse. <u>Be careful what you ask for..... you just might get it</u>.
</p>

More accurate words have never been spoken.......see below. </p>

obama%27s+lie.jpg
</p>

bow+suadi.png
</p>

rude+obama.jpg
</p>

obama+is+a+joke.jpg
</p>

you+lie.jpg
</p>

obama.jpg
</p>

cartoonobama.jpg
</p>

Picture+12.png
</p>

Picture+23.png
</p>

</p>
 
Very good read, but some will not get the point, or the context.
A couple of prime votes today..Delaware is a good example..9-14-10..Taxed Enough Already= TEA
Vote 'em all out,,,you have to take a chance, not "change" as has been fed to all americans by this admistration.
Even the union leaders are calling for ,"Unite America", but you cannot have those leaders running America EITHER, they are part of the problem. They are out of control, along with the 545 in Washington D C.
Now if it's an axe to grind, just look at Europe, it's coming to our shores at sunami speed.
 
outcaster - 9/14/2010 8:28 PM

What makes you think the ones you vote in will be any better than the ones you vote out? And don't say they can't be any worse......... because they can be worse. Be careful what you ask for..... you just might get it.

Cannot get much worse than olbummer and company. I am willing to do my part to vote out every last one of them. If we all do the same then maybe, just maybe the next bunch will get the message that they better put out or they will be voted out.
 
cheez - 9/16/2010 11:11 AM

outcaster - 9/14/2010 8:28 PM

What makes you think the ones you vote in will be any better than the ones you vote out? And don't say they can't be any worse......... because they can be worse. Be careful what you ask for..... you just might get it.

Cannot get much worse than olbummer and company. I am willing to do my part to vote out every last one of them. If we all do the same then maybe, just maybe the next bunch will get the message that they better put out or they will be voted out.

So who Exactly are you gonna vote out in Nov?. And what is the one that you are voting in, gonna do to help? Those two points are more important than just voting someone out.
 
outcaster - 9/16/2010 1:13 PM

cheez - 9/16/2010 11:11 AM

outcaster - 9/14/2010 8:28 PM

What makes you think the ones you vote in will be any better than the ones you vote out? And don't say they can't be any worse......... because they can be worse. Be careful what you ask for..... you just might get it.

Cannot get much worse than olbummer and company. I am willing to do my part to vote out every last one of them. If we all do the same then maybe, just maybe the next bunch will get the message that they better put out or they will be voted out.

So who Exactly are you gonna vote out in Nov?. And what is the one that you are voting in, gonna do to help? Those two points are more important than just voting someone out.

Well I won't get to vote out anybody on the federal level this time. No incumbents are running. I do think Chuck Fleishmann shares most of my beliefs. I cannot say (nor can anybody) what a candidate will or will not do once in office. All we really have to go by is their past.
 
outcaster - 9/16/2010 12:13 PM

So who Exactly are you gonna vote out in Nov?. And what is the one that you are voting in, gonna do to help? Those two points are more important than just voting someone out.

WRONG!!!!!!!!!

The act of voting the lying, theiving bastards out will send a clear message to those that remain, do the will of the people or lose your job. Afterall the PRIMARY job of EVERY politician is to get re-elected. It is not to do their job.
 
rstewart - 9/16/2010 3:48 PM

outcaster - 9/16/2010 12:13 PM

So who Exactly are you gonna vote out in Nov?. And what is the one that you are voting in, gonna do to help? Those two points are more important than just voting someone out.

WRONG!!!!!!!!!

The act of voting the lying, theiving bastards out will send a clear message to those that remain, do the will of the people or lose your job. Afterall the PRIMARY job of EVERY politician is to get re-elected. It is not to do their job.

This is what I have been screaming for over a year now.
 
rstewart - 9/16/2010 3:48 PM

outcaster - 9/16/2010 12:13 PM

So who Exactly are you gonna vote out in Nov?. And what is the one that you are voting in, gonna do to help? Those two points are more important than just voting someone out.

WRONG!!!!!!!!!

The act of voting the lying, theiving bastards out will send a clear message to those that remain, do the will of the people or lose your job. Afterall the PRIMARY job of EVERY politician is to get re-elected. It is not to do their job.

Didn't we just vote the thieving bastards out in 06 and 08? Your theory sounds nice, and gets a lot of "Hell Yeah's", and "Amen Brother's", but you're living in fantasy land. You're right on one thing, anyone who is newly elected to Congress will begin immediately doing the things necessary to get re-elected. Bringing Federal dollars, and projects back to his/her district is JOB 1. Zach Wamp was a master at bringing $$ back to TN Valley. That's why he got re-elected every 2 years virtually un-opposed the entire time he served in Congress. His predecessor Rep Lloyd, a Democrat did the same thing throughout the 70's and 80's. Chuck Fleischmann will get the memo too. I know he's saying all the right things you want to hear. But if he is true to his word, and stops earmark spending, even for his own District, he will be outta there in just one term((I think he already knows this). This area is very dependent on Federal dollars, more so than any district in TN. The TN 3rd gets more money from Washington DC than it send there in tax dollars.
 
outcaster - 9/16/2010 6:25 PM


Didn't we just vote the thieving bastards out in 06 and 08? .

Not really Danny. Many got the boot but the vast majority of incumbents returned to their life of crime. In order for the message sent to be effective we must AS A NATION give all senators and congressman the boot. I know this is a dream because most prople think the problem is with "the other guys"
Well the problem is with every last one of them.
 
cheez - 9/17/2010 9:01 AM

outcaster - 9/16/2010 6:25 PM


Didn't we just vote the thieving bastards out in 06 and 08? .

Not really Danny. Many got the boot but the vast majority of incumbents returned to their life of crime. In order for the message sent to be effective we must AS A NATION give all senators and congressman the boot. I know this is a dream because most prople think the problem is with "the other guys"
Well the problem is with every last one of them.

So are you saying..... that if Zack Wamp had decided not to run for Governor, but instead decided to seek another 2 year term in Congress, you would vote for his Democrat challenger John Wolfe? Forgive me, but I'm finding it difficult to believe that.
http://www.specialprojectsunit.com/wolfecongress/
Wolfe is more Liberal then I am. I can't imagine you would ever vote for him under ANY circumstances. Which brings me back to my original point: If you vote'm all out.... you gotta vote someone in. The one going "in" is much more important than the one going "out".
 
outcaster - 9/17/2010 12:44 PM

cheez - 9/17/2010 9:01 AM

outcaster - 9/16/2010 6:25 PM


Didn't we just vote the thieving bastards out in 06 and 08? .

Not really Danny. Many got the boot but the vast majority of incumbents returned to their life of crime. In order for the message sent to be effective we must AS A NATION give all senators and congressman the boot. I know this is a dream because most prople think the problem is with "the other guys"
Well the problem is with every last one of them.

So are you saying..... that if Zack Wamp had decided not to run for Governor, but instead decided to seek another 2 year term in Congress, you would vote for his Democrat challenger John Wolfe? Forgive me, but I'm finding it difficult to believe that.
http://www.specialprojectsunit.com/wolfecongress/
Wolfe is more Liberal then I am. I can't imagine you would ever vote for him under ANY circumstances. Which brings me back to my original point: If you vote'm all out.... you gotta vote someone in. The one going "in" is much more important than the one going "out".

I would not vote for Wolfe under any circumstances. If your scenario played out and there were no other candidates I would write in Beetlespin.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top