Supreme Court confirmation process...do we need it?

[SpurHunter]

Why waste the taxpayers money. We all know she will be confirmed. I guess it just chaps me to hear her say, "I will seperate politics from the law" utter nonsense. </p>

Look at the ruling this week on the Second Amendment, it went right down party lines, just as any politcal issue before the courts. </p>

 

[Eyeman2]

If Kagan get the nod, we have lost the higest court in the USA.
She admits to be a "Progressive", in her writings. That my friends is DANGEROUS!!

 

[NRG]

Everything is dangerous to somebody .. rock and roll was dangerous, books dangerous, freedom of speech dangerous, women voting dangerous, and on and on and on .. the most dangerous is stupidity and ignorance .... most likely they will confirm her . only 12 have not been confirmed since 1793.

Here is the list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsuccessful_nominations_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

 

[rstewart]

A liberal replacing a liberal sounds about like an even swap to me.

 

[Guest]

rstewart - 7/8/2010 6:41 PM

A liberal replacing a liberal sounds about like an even swap to me.

Pretty much like replacing cow manure with horse manure.

 

[shsimons]

She seemed fine to me, I watched for quite awhile on CSPAN. I will tell you what I'm tired of, hearing republicans/democrats fight with each other on t.v. like children. I think they should eliminate the parties and have individuals. you think what YOU think, and that is it!

 

[Guest]

shsimons - 7/9/2010 11:08 PM

She seemed fine to me, I watched for quite awhile on CSPAN. I will tell you what I'm tired of, hearing republicans/democrats fight with each other on t.v. like children. I think they should eliminate the parties and have individuals. you think what YOU think, and that is it!

Dream on Sam.