Vote's needed on Nov.2

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

Pop-R

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
623
Location
Cleveland
I recieved this in an email and decided to pass it along.

Subject: Right to Hunt & Fish in Tennessee

On November 2, 2010 we will go to the polls to elect a new governor in Tennessee . On that same ballot will be the right to vote for an Amendment to the Tennessee Constitution allowing for the right of Tennesseans to hunt and fish. Even though we have been hunting and fishing in Tennessee as long as I have been alive, it is not a guaranteed right. With the amendment, it will make it much more difficult for anti hunting and fishing folks to challenge the right.

In the last election for a Tennessee Governor, 1,900,000 votes were cast. In order to pass the amendment fifty (50%) plus one votes must be cast as a YES vote. If this election follows the pattern of the last election, we will need 950,001 votes. There are not enough registered voters who hunt and fish to pass this amendment by ourselves. Therefore, we need to make sure our spouses and our friends know to vote YES for the Amendment to the state constitution.

I have talked to several folks about this and they have said “but we already have the right to hunt and fish”. Yes we do but the animal rights folks (PETA) are very well funded and they are passionate about stopping hunting and fishing. If we stand by and do nothing, there very well may come a day when we no longer have these rights.

Fourteen states have already passed an amendment to hunt and fish. Tennessee , Arkansas and South Carolina will vote for the amendment in November.

Please, don’t take your rights for granted. Send this email to everyone who believes we should have the right to hunt and fish.

If you want to know more about this issue, go to the Tennessee Wildlife Federation Web site at www.tnwf.org to get more information.
 
I voted for this in Georgia when I lived down there. This won't stop PETA and HSUS but it will slow them down considerably and make them spend a lot more of their money. This is a VERY important vote. I look forward to doing my part now that I am a TN resident.
 
I have yet to see the proposed language. I will not lend support for anything until I can read the actual language. The right to fish should include the ability to wade moving waters, as IMO the waters belong to the state and not riparian land owners.
 
Bfish - 8/30/2010 2:11 PM

I have yet to see the proposed language. I will not lend support for anything until I can read the actual language. The right to fish should include the ability to wade moving waters, as IMO the waters belong to the state and not riparian land owners.

Why read it first, lets pass it and then find out what's in it like Congress did with the HC bill. That's Nancy Pelosi way........ emoLaugh
 
TritonAL186 - 8/30/2010 6:07 PM

Bfish - 8/30/2010 2:11 PM

I have yet to see the proposed language. I will not lend support for anything until I can read the actual language. The right to fish should include the ability to wade moving waters, as IMO the waters belong to the state and not riparian land owners.

Why read it first, lets pass it and then find out what's in it like Congress did with the HC bill. That's Nancy Pelosi way........ emoLaugh

You would think Bfish would be the first to jump for this very reason. But then again the troll comes out and he will be against anything that might offend some panty waste liberal.
 
Cheez, my concern is that this could be potential a poorly worded proclamation. IF poorly worded, it could actually be used against us and allow for some unnecessary restrictions on our ability to hunt and fish. I have read several from other states, and believe that do not do an adequate job of protecting our rights, especially on the fishing side.
 
Bfish - 8/31/2010 11:14 AM

Cheez, my concern is that this could be potential a poorly worded proclamation. IF poorly worded, it could actually be used against us and allow for some unnecessary restrictions on our ability to hunt and fish. I have read several from other states, and believe that do not do an adequate job of protecting our rights, especially on the fishing side.

I'll go for that but I will support it until such time as I see it is somehow detrimental to our cause.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top