outcaster
Well-known member
Now that the Nov elections are coming up. The 3rd Congressional dist race to replace Zachariah Wampus is heating up. All of the candidates are trying to "out conservative" the other. Most, if not all of the Republican candidates are promising to "Clean up" Washington by not voting for, and stopping spending "earmarks". I wonder if all these "fiscal conservatives" are aware that the TN 3rd district gets more earmark spending than any other district in TN. Additionally, the 3rd dist. gets MORE money from Washington than it sends up there. So all of us that live in the TN 3rd are enjoying "more than our share" of gubment assistance. So.... Think about that next time you pay your next power bill, or lock thru one of the dams, or drive over one of the bridges....... or fish on the TN River. Some poor schmuck in Fiddlefart, Indiana is subsidizing your good life here.
I wonder how long the one that wins Zach's seat will hold out before caving and voting for a spending earmark once he/she learns how Washington works. If the new 3rd Rep does not send money back to the district and does not support TVA they will be out by 2012. I think all of the candidates know this already. They just won't say it. While I disagree with Zach on almost every political issue. The man did his job. He got every penny he could for us and strongly supported TVA funding for his district. Just imagine what would happen to a 3rd dist Rep that let TVA funding shrink under his/her watch.
So... I guess my question is...... do you really believe any of these candidates when they tell us that they will not be supporting "earmark spending"?....... even when the spending is for us? Or are they just telling you what you want to here?
We really do love our gubment assistance down here even though most wail against it.............. for others
I wonder how long the one that wins Zach's seat will hold out before caving and voting for a spending earmark once he/she learns how Washington works. If the new 3rd Rep does not send money back to the district and does not support TVA they will be out by 2012. I think all of the candidates know this already. They just won't say it. While I disagree with Zach on almost every political issue. The man did his job. He got every penny he could for us and strongly supported TVA funding for his district. Just imagine what would happen to a 3rd dist Rep that let TVA funding shrink under his/her watch.
So... I guess my question is...... do you really believe any of these candidates when they tell us that they will not be supporting "earmark spending"?....... even when the spending is for us? Or are they just telling you what you want to here?
We really do love our gubment assistance down here even though most wail against it.............. for others