Christmas Hypocrite

[Liveliner]

<font size="2">Hypocrite - An Atheist or Agnostic who celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ.</font></p>

<font size="2">If you do not believe in Jesus Christ then do not put up a Christmas Tree, Do not share gifts and for the sake of God do not get that warm Holiday Spirit. The Christmas Holiday is a religious holiday reserved only for those of us that believe and honor the birth of a Savior,</font></p>

<font size="2">Wal-mart may not like this idea. But here in the Chattanooga area the Wal-marts have removed their Christmas trees so as to not piss-off the "others". They still want your money though.</font></p>

 

[jkmort]

Jesus is the Reason for the Season. You cannot spell Christmas without Christ. We celebrate Him.

 

[Guest]

Wally has always been a bunch of fence riding hypocrites. ALL they are about is making the dollar. They don't worry about alienating the Christians much. They know most of them are only Christians when it is convenient to do so. Wally knows that the Christians allowed a small group to get prayer out of schools. Wally knows that Christians have allowed over 40 million innocent babies to be murdered over the last 37 years. Wally knows that over half of this country elected an inexperienced America hating muslim to the highest office in the land.
With this knowledge Wal-Mart surely knows that taking Christmas out of their stores will not effect their bottom line enough to even notice.

 

[Jmax]

MMMM...they are in the doors of the Wal-Mart at Ooltawah. I have my own set of concerns and stuff that upsets me with Wal-Mart but they still sell and promote Christmas stuff the last time I looked. I left them and retired early over some of the directions they took a couple years after Sam passed. I do not feel or believe they have their employee's well being on the top ah....200 things they are concerned about or trying to improve. They are concerned about their own well being if you are an upper management person in the Home Office but that is about as far as it goes. Just like so many companies today, the top 5% to 10% get the benefits and pay with the lower worker getting the shaft. emoGeezer Jmax

 

[Liveliner]

My topic was more about people who are the Hypocrites Wally just loves the money making holiday and would be effected if there were no hypocrites who bought gifts from them. The atheistic and agnostics are the hypocrites.

 

[fischnrod]

cheez - 12/2/2010 10:31 AM

Wally has always been a bunch of fence riding hypocrites. ALL they are about is making the dollar. They don't worry about alienating the Christians much. They know most of them are only Christians when it is convenient to do so. Wally knows that the Christians allowed a small group to get prayer out of schools. Wally knows that Christians have allowed over 40 million innocent babies to be murdered over the last 37 years. Wally knows that over half of this country elected an inexperienced America hating muslim to the highest office in the land.
With this knowledge Wal-Mart surely knows that taking Christmas out of their stores will not effect their bottom line enough to even notice.

emoThumbsup emoThumbsup emoThumbsup emoUSA emoUSA emoUSA

 

[Pop-R]

This isn't to stir up controversy but rather a different view. How much of Christmas is bible based? Some people only go to church this one time a year.
I am a Christian and my family doesn't look at this as a religious holiday. But rather a time of being together and sharing gifts with the ones we love. The bible doesn't instruct us to observe Christ birth. Most of what you see for the holiday is made up by man.
God probably doesn't approve of the way a lot of us run up debt for this day and the attitude of children and adults when it comes to there wants for themselves. Even the religious things people think of aren't in line with God's written word.
For example the "nativity scene" with the shepherds, Mary and Joseph, baby Jesus and the "three wise men"? The bible doesn't say how many wise men there were. Matthew tells us when they found Jesus they went "into the house" (Matt. 2:1-11). No mention is made of the manger. "They came to Jerusalem after Jesus had been presented in the temple, and taken back to Bethlehem. So this could have been several weeks before they saw him.
How should I remember Jesus? God has left three memorials to Christ -- all of which point to His death and resurrection.
First, water baptism reminds us of the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus (Rom. 6:3-4).
Second, the Lord's supper is a constant reminder of His death. As we partake of the unleavened bread and the fruit of the vine, we "proclaim the Lord's death till He comes" (1 Cor. 11:26).
Third, our worship on the Lord's day, the first day of the week, reminds us of His resurrection (Matt. 28:1; Acts 20:7; Rev. 1:10).
God does not want His Son remembered as a baby lying in a manger, but as the suffering Savior and now resurrected Redeemer.

 

[Possum]

Christmas is a communist holliday, is it not. A time when we actually spread the wealth. However, it could be a capitalistic holliday where people buy stuff and it creates jobs, and because it creates jobs people can buy stuff. Just some food for thought, I am going to celebrate the birth of Jesus regardless. I really do not understand the mind set of Walmart though. I have many friends that although not Christian looks at Jesus as a prophet not a savior but celebrates anyway because it is a time for love, joy, and happiness. I hope everyone has a safe and joyful Merry Christmas this year with family and friends. My advice, decompress and just enjoy.

 

[outcaster]

I'm amazed that cheez can find a way to make to work Obama into any topic. Funny, no, sad really

 

[Liveliner]

Danny, didn't you hear Obamaclaus has a surprise for us all. LOL Merry Christmas my friend.

 

[Guest]

outcaster - 12/2/2010 6:53 PM

I'm amazed that cheez can find a way to make to work Obama into any topic. Funny, no, sad really

The thread topic is about hypocrites. The hypocrites that claim Christ as their saviour yet vote for a minion of satan for pure personal gain are the greatest of hypocrites.

 

[outcaster]

cheez - 12/3/2010 9:52 AM

outcaster - 12/2/2010 6:53 PM

I'm amazed that cheez can find a way to make to work Obama into any topic. Funny, no, sad really

The thread topic is about hypocrites. The hypocrites that claim Christ as their saviour yet vote for a minion of satan for pure personal gain are the greatest of hypocrites.

I think someone that claims he wants the Gov't off our backs and out of our lives, but yet wants the gov't to monitor every bedroom, and the womb of every woman...... is KING of the hypocrites

 

[Guest]

outcaster - 12/3/2010 9:54 PM

cheez - 12/3/2010 9:52 AM

outcaster - 12/2/2010 6:53 PM

I'm amazed that cheez can find a way to make to work Obama into any topic. Funny, no, sad really

The thread topic is about hypocrites. The hypocrites that claim Christ as their saviour yet vote for a minion of satan for pure personal gain are the greatest of hypocrites.

I think someone that claims he wants the Gov't off our backs and out of our lives, but yet wants the gov't to monitor every bedroom, and the womb of every woman...... is KING of the hypocrites[/QUOTE

Well this might come as a real shock to you Danny. I really do not care what you think of me. There is NOTHING you can do about it anyway. I never once said I wanted the government in anybody's bedroom or womb. If you say I did then you sir are a liar.

 

[outcaster]

cheez - 12/4/2010 6:59 PM

outcaster - 12/3/2010 9:54 PM

cheez - 12/3/2010 9:52 AM

outcaster - 12/2/2010 6:53 PM

I'm amazed that cheez can find a way to make to work Obama into any topic. Funny, no, sad really

The thread topic is about hypocrites. The hypocrites that claim Christ as their saviour yet vote for a minion of satan for pure personal gain are the greatest of hypocrites.

I think someone that claims he wants the Gov't off our backs and out of our lives, but yet wants the gov't to monitor every bedroom, and the womb of every woman...... is KING of the hypocrites[/QUOTE

Well this might come as a real shock to you Danny. I really do not care what you think of me. There is NOTHING you can do about it anyway. I never once said I wanted the government in anybody's bedroom or womb. If you say I did then you sir are a liar.

You may not have used those exact words, but you have made your extreme right wing opinions on those two subjects quite clear over the last couple of years. I just I just called you on the hypocrisy of it, and you call me a liar? That' funny!

 

[Guest]

Show us one post that you say I made that suggests the government should not protect the lives of the people of this country. Just one.

 

[outcaster]

Do I have to explain EVERYTHING to you?....... Even your own posts? I know, (via your posts) that you are of the opinion that our gov't is too big, and too intrusive in our lives, we would all be better off if we had little to no gov't telling us what to do. Am I wrong there? I also know (via your posts) that would deny a woman's "right to choose" to terminate a pregnancy no matter the reason or circumstances. Again, am I wrong? Additionally, I, and others have given you ample opportunity on this forum to denounce and condemn people like Scott Roeder, and Eric Rudolph who share most of your views on the subject, and have committed acts of terror, yet you have remained curiously silent concerning them.

I also know that you would deny homosexuals the right to form domestic partnerships, and serve openly, and honorably in our military, and do not believe that anti-discrimination laws should apply to them. Am I wrong? Additionally, I and others have given you ample opportunity on this forum to denounce and condemn the group from Westboro Baptist Church that protests and holds signs near fallen American soldiers funerals, claiming that the soldiers death is "Gods punishment to America" for condoning homosexuality. Yet again you have remained curiously silent concerning them.

Are any of those above statements un-true?

So let me tie it together for you. In order for your views on these two subjects to be the "law of the land", it would require the gov't to in effect monitor the womb of every woman, and literally monitor the bedrooms of homosexuals, and suspected homosexuals. (which btw the military does). Both those situations will require our gov't to be extremely intrusive into the lives of the people involved. And for someone who claims to believe that the gov't is already too intrusive in our lives, but wants MORE gov't intrusion (when it suits his views), is yes, the King of the hypocrites.

 

[Buoy-Master]

From Walmart Trees to this...You guys need help.

 

[Guest]

BBass - 12/5/2010 10:29 AM

From Walmart Trees to this...You guys need help.

Read the title of the thread Billy.

 

[Guest]

outcaster - 12/5/2010 10:27 AM

I know, (via your posts) that you are of the opinion that our gov't is too big, and too intrusive in our lives, ABSOLUTELY TRUE

we would all be better off if we had little to no gov't telling us what to do. Am I wrong there? YES YOU ARE WRONG HERE

I also know (via your posts) that would deny a woman's "right to choose" to terminate a pregnancy no matter the reason or circumstances. ABSOLUTELY TRUE. SHE MADE HER CHOICE WHEN SHE SPREAD HER LEGS IN MOST CASES. AS FAR AS THE RAPE/INCEST THING GOES, NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO PLAY GOD.

Additionally, I, and others have given you ample opportunity on this forum to denounce and condemn people like Scott Roeder, and Eric Rudolph who share most of your views on the subject, and have committed acts of terror, yet you have remained curiously silent concerning them. ANYBODY THAT TAKES THE LIFE OF ANOTHER FOR REASONS OTHER THAN SELF DEFENSE OR THE DEFENSE OF SOMEONE ELSE OR AS PUNISHMENT FOR A SUITABLE CRIME IS WRONG.

I also know that you would deny homosexuals the right to form domestic partnerships ABOLUTELY. HOMOSEXUALITY IS AN UN-NATURAL ACT AND SHOULD NOT BE REWARDED BY EXTENDING THE BENEFITS THAT MEN AND WOMEN HAVE. I HAVE NOT ASKED FOR GOVERNMENT INTRUSION HERE. JUST LET THEM DO THEIR DISGUSTING THING.

, and serve openly, and honorably in our military, and do not believe that anti-discrimination laws should apply to them. Am I wrong? YES YOU ARE DEAD WRONG AGAIN. I NEVER ONCE SAID A WORD ABOUT QUEERS IN THE MILITARY. I REALLY DON'T CARE EITHER WAY. I DO NOT THINK SPECIAL LAWS SHOULD BE CREATED TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS. THERE ARE ALREADY LAWS IN PLACE.

Additionally, I and others have given you ample opportunity on this forum to denounce and condemn the group from Westboro Baptist Church that protests and holds signs near fallen American soldiers funerals, claiming that the soldiers death is "Gods punishment to America" for condoning homosexuality. Yet again you have remained curiously silent concerning them. HERE AGAIN IS WHERE YOU SIR ARE A LIAR. I HAVE SAID REPEATEDLY THAT WESTBORO CHURCH IS A BUNCH OF NUTJOBS.

Are any of those above statements un-true?

So let me tie it together for you. In order for your views on these two subjects to be the "law of the land", it would require the gov't to in effect monitor the womb of every woman, THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE TO "MONITOR" ANYTHING. JUST MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO MURDER A BABY NO MATTER WHAT STAGE OF LIFE IT IS IN.

and literally monitor the bedrooms of homosexuals, and suspected homosexuals. (which btw the military does). NO INTRUSION REQUIRED. JUST DON'T MAKE SPECIAL LAWS TO CATER TO THEM. Both those situations will require our gov't to be extremely intrusive into the lives of the people involved. NO THEY DO NOT.

And for someone who claims to believe that the gov't is already too intrusive in our lives, but wants MORE gov't intrusion (when it suits his views), is yes, the King of the hypocrites.

MY BELIEFS REQUIRE ACTUALLY LESS GOVERNMENT INTRUSION. SO YET AGAIN YOU DANNY ARE QUITE WRONG.

 

[fredsharky]

WOW!!! and I thought people in Arkansas were nuts....

Christmas was started as a pagan holiday and was transformed into a Christian holiday. There are so many things to read now on this thing called the internet. Also there are many books on the issue.