Grass, green stuff, fishing nirvana

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

Well I hate to whip a dead horse to death but here goes. I began fishing the chick back in the Mid to late 60's when I was just a kid with my dad and my uncle. I have been on the water now for over 40 years and have seen many changes, some good and some bad. By FAR the worst thing I have ever seen happen to the lake was the use of weed killers on milfoil and vegetation.

The milfoil that everyone has been speaking of as an "invasive" species is, if I am not mistaken, eurasian milfoil. It migrated to our water in the early 70's and with it's advent we began to see bass fishing, crappie fishing and bream fishing EXPLODE. It was NOTHING in 1978 or therebouts to go and catch 40 or 50 bass in a 3 hour trip. Keeper bass being a huge portion of them. Harvesting of fish was up too. Many people fished from the banks and took home loads of fish. You could go to any place the milfoil was located and toss a spinner bait in and literally watch the wake from numerous fish closing in on it. I did it hundreds of times. I can't tell you how many times I brought up trophy bass from out of those weeds. The milfoil would grow up to the top in water around 5 to 6 feet deep and "mat". All you had to do was toss around those mats. The milfoil gave a clear indication of where the shallow water was, you didn't even need a finder. In the fall the dead weeds gave cover to bass and I caught a ton of crappie out of it. In a word it was fishing heaven! I don't know the exact year that TVA did what they did, but I do recall the effect. The lake simply died. Crappie were as scarce as hens teeth. Bass began to disappear. Our famous fishery had all but died. But hey, the pleasure boaters and dock owners were happy! In about 1985 I gave up fishing in disgust. I'm sure Fat Albert can relate. In remembering all this I have a couple of points and then I'll shut up.

1. I've heard folks talking about milfoil as an invasive non-native species. I would agree. But when does it become "native"? Ginko trees were imported here and are now considered common. Many types of grasses are the same way. Same with apple trees and fruit trees. How the heck do people think things spread out over the world? The islands in Hawaii had NO vegetation at all when they were created. ANYTHING and I do mean anything that came there had to be carried in on birds, fish, washed ashore, by boat, or by man. But as some point some of these things had to become native didn't they? Milfoil is here and here and I hope, to stay. In another 20 or 30 years I don't think they'll be this high minded debate about whether it is native or not, it is just here. In most ways this is the way that good things and some bad things spread. Milfoil, I believe, is a good thing for fisheries. Before anyone says it I understand about snake heads, zebra mussles and all that. Some things are good, some are bad. We just have to sort them out.

2. The biggest gripe about water weeds and milfoil comes from dock owners and pleasure boaters. Milfoil and weeds do not grow in deep waters so the pleasure boaters should not have an issue as long as they are out of fishing areas. Jet ski folks hated it because they couldn't ride close to the banks. Too bad. The dock owners I can understand to SOME degree but several members of my family had and do have docks. We never had much of an issue with milfoil. If you build on the water you must expect to endure water weeds and bass fishermen. Wormhook is on the mark when he speaks of folks here not caring one bit about fishermen. 85% of the docks have pleasure boats tied to them, not bass or fishing boats. I don't want to make this an "us or them" argument but we have to wake up. People with lakefront property usually have a little cash. Cash talks when it comes to policy. We need to make our voices heard when we see the air boats on the lake or copters in the air. My stance is simple; if you have a dock and milfoil becomes an issue, don't advocate killing all the weeds in the lake. There has to be a middle ground here but I can't help thinking about the folks in Birchwood where I grew up. They put in these huge luxury sub divisions in a cow pasture and then the yuppies that move in complain about the smell of manure!!!!! Don't live there if you don't like to see cows and can't endure the smell of manure. It is part of living in the country, a location YOU chose. Many of the folks that buy lake front property have a mistaken idea that when they bought it, they bought the water in front of it to. I'll never forget my Jet ski incident where the woman told me I was trespassing, as I sat in the water in front of her HUGE, HUGE dock that she had built into the public lake. Many folks have that mentality. (No Polo I don't mean you! emoSmile)

3. Finally I think the growth of milfoil enhances fisheries. I know that Carl has issues with it and I respect that, but in all the research that I have seen, milfoil and weed growth is an asset with limited growth control. I understand the debate about it killing native plants. Sometimes it does and sometimes it won't. I DO know that sonar and the like kills EVERYTHING. The bottom of the lake is like a desert for years. Grass along the shore line dies. Plus, what the heck does it do to the fish? Would you like to eat fish dipped in sonar or any weed killer? Sure they say it is safe, but they said that about cigarettes also. And numerous drugs. And agent orange. I could go on and on. Let's be on guard, observe, fish, stay informed, and fight the weed killers.
 
Meeeeee, I love the stuff and will fish it when ever possible. But as the old saying goes, too much of anything will kill you. To much alcohol and you drown, to much food and you get so fat, you can't fish (might as well be dead), and so on.
I prefer native vegetation because it will provide many beneficial qualities to the entire fishery. They have natural predators, don't completely take over, and do not have to be controlled by mankind. (a win-win situation)

This is not a battle to be won, this is a situation where, all stakeholders need to get together, and make a plan of action that is agreeable to all about how to control the new emergents. This is a chance educationally, to teach everyone about the benefits of producing a better water resource while understanding that some sacrifices are going to have to be made by all groups. E. Milfoil and Hydrilla control is not cheap, who gets to foot that bill?
 
Wonder how many taxpayer dollars TVA spent to eliminate fish habitat in eradicating the grass & then spent to plant those stupid cypress trees in 12" of water & saying that was their stellar effort at habitat restoration. Those trees were planted at least 12 yrs. ago & the things are still less than 8' tall. At this rate, maybe my great grandchildren will have a slight chance to catch a bass around one. When was the last time you caught a limit on the "cypress tree pattern" ? Make it even. I'd pay an extra dollar on my boat registration each year for vegetation CONTROL. Make every boat & PWC owner pay a $1 Aquatic Plant Control fee with their registration. It would fund a huge chunk of it.
 
Fishermen had to pay tax dollars to get our lakes poisoned, let pleasure boaters & PWC owners pay a little to keep vegetation managed. If you asked them to pay a dollar to eradicate it, they'd jump at the chance. Let them help pay to manage it. If they won't help pay, then leave the grass alone. The Chick is deep enough where coverage would never reach 40% anyway. I've never seen E. milfoil grow in over 10' of water. Here it would manage itself.
 
That was one of the beautiful things about milfoil when it was heavy on the chick, it was only in fairly shallow water and only during high summer. I agree about letting the pleasure boaters and the dock owners help pay for control. It's about time that some burden for mantaining the lake came back to them, rather than us.
 
FF,
Exactly my point. Whenever anyone talks about the health & viability of our waterways, they always want to know what sportsman are going to do to improve or maintain it. Are we the only ones who use & enjoy the resource? Don't think so... Any weekend afternoon fishermen are outnumbered 10 to 1 by pleasure boaters. Do they have some responsibility in keeping our waters healthy & biologically sound? Dang right they do! Any biologist will tell you that in an aging reservoir, a healthy coverage of aquatic vegetation not only increases fish habitat, but also improves water quality by filtering impurities & increasing disolved oxygen levels. So let them help pay to maintain a healthy balance of vegetation.
 
One of our members is asking TN. Wildlife to put a fee on all bass fisherman. It is to be like a trout stamp. Any comments?
 
DTRITON - 11/23/2006 7:04 PM


One of our members is asking TN. Wildlife to put a fee on all bass fisherman. It is to be like a trout stamp. Any comments?


Personally, I wouldn't be opposed, but again, it allows complete burden of proper management of our lakes on fishermen. Probably to the tune of an additional $10-$12 per angler. Probably more funds could be raised from a $1-$2 lake usage fee to go with boat registration & spread the responsibility among ALL lake users.
 
TR20bh - 11/23/2006 12:26 PM

The Chick is deep enough where coverage would never reach 40% anyway. I've never seen E. milfoil grow in over 10' of water. Here it would manage itself.

When I talked about the percent of coverage, that percentage is not related to the entire lake surface. It was specifically set for the littoral zone.
Excerpt from [email protected] The"Littoral zone is an interface region between the land of the drainage basins and the open water of lakes. This region is characterized by high plant and animal species diversity and is commonly the site where fish reproduction and development occur. Those rooted emergent, floating, and submersed vascular plants in the littoral zone are collectively called macrophytes. " typically this area or zone is the first ten to fifteen feet of depth for a given body of water and depends on turbidity of the water ( the clearer the water the deeper the littoral zone). There are places on the "chick" that the percent of coverage is already past 40%.
 
Carl Guffey - 11/25/2006 2:13 PM
There are places on the "chick" that the percent of coverage is already past 40%.

On Nickajack it's closer to 100% coverage. Some of the better fish populations are further upstream these days, where the grass is sparser. I've been saying they need to 'mow' a third of the lower end of Nickajack for years. Not chemically treated, but dredged. Most of my fishing friends give me the evil eye when I mention getting rid of grass, but I've noticed a decline in the fishery over the last five years that's, in my opinion, directly related to the overabundance of vegataion. Most of my friends argue that the decline I'm seeing is because the heavy grass makes the fish harder to catch. Granted, the heavier cover could potentially reduce my overall catch rate, but they're missing the big picture, and that's the increasing decline in recruitment of young fish into the population. The fact that I'm seeing fewer smaller fish each year (with the exception of nothern-strain spotted bass) is a huge concern for me, and the biggest reason I would lobby for a reduction in the vegetation on Nickajack.

So saith me - regardless of how many evil looks I get...
 
When milfoil was at the very peak on the chick it never went out further than 6 to 8 feet in depth in any place I fished. It only started in the spring, peaked in the summer, and died back in the fall and winter. People that actually used their docks had no problem using them, it was the folks that went out once a month or less that had milfoil growing around the docks and even that was a small percentage. I think most of the fishing folks are for a limited control of weeds in the lake. Just NOT the total declaration of war that happened in the mid to late 80's. For the life of me I can't understand why a slough in the middle of no where, with no houses and no people other than fishermen would be sprayed?! Is it so the jet skis don't get caught in the weed? I used to fish a small slough that you had to go under a culvert to get to. A boat could not even get in there, I had to use a canoe. It was full of bass and milfoil. I fished it for years and caught more fish than I could dream of catching now. One day I went to my "spot" and found a TVA airboat sitting just outside the culvert spraying the entrance and the surrounding area. The next summer there was no milfoil and you couldn't buy a SINGLE bite in that slough. I had fished it many times from the entrance and all the way to the end and back up. It was nothing to cover it in 3 hours and have boated 40 to 60 fish. If you didn't have a strike every 4 or 5 minutes you weren't doing something right! With the advent of the spray and the loss of the milfoil the place was a ghost town. It has been that way now for 20 years. I finally went back this past summer, fished the entire thing with no luck and found a small quarter acre patch of milfoil, trying to come back in the very rear of the slough. Just for old times sake I tossed a SB at the edge.......BAM! Faster than I could pull them in I caught 6 bass around the edges of the milfoil. Looking closer I could see baitfish moving in and out of it. Turtles were feeding on it. Big bream were darting in and out of it. The milfoil was back! Now let's just hope they leave it alone and let it create a paradise out of our fishery. Milfoil can be a problem on shallow lakes I'm sure. But I don't think, with minimal control, it would ever be a problem on the Chick.
 
You are on the money David! It was a heck of an area to fish. One of the ladies on here caught a nice smallie just outside the culvert a few months back.
 
Here is the contact information for TDEC(Tennessee Department of Enviroment). Please if you see someone casting or spraying materials into the lake, put the contact information on your phone and use it. If you have a picture phone, take a shot and waypoint it if possible, or at least mark a map.


Paul E. Davis, P.E., Director
6th Floor, L&C Annex
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN
37243-1534
615-532-0625
 
Thanks for the info Carl! Back 20 years ago when I saw it I didn't even have a clue as to what they were doing. Now we are all informed. I'd say in addition to doing that we need to post it asap on this forum and let folks know so we can add some voices to the mix. Thanks again.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top