Not Specific Subject

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

This is something that certain teachers are doing, as a part of their social studies activities. At least here, its not required curriculum.
 
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that all must lend a hand [?]
To make this country strong again
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said we must be clear today
Equal work means equal pay
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said that we must take a stand
To make sure everyone gets a chance
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
He said Red, Yellow, Black or White
All are equal in his sight
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama
Yes
Mmm, mmm, mm!
Barack Hussein Obama

I am surprised they did not capitalize His in the lyrics when they printed them...
 
cheez - 9/24/2009 3:02 PM

I did not bother to Snopes it because Snopes is a liberal entity anyway. In other words what they say can also be taken with a grain of salt.

Either way R14 the similarites between olbummer and Hitler are undeniable no matter who wrote the article.

How is Snopes liberal? Is it because they debunk your falsehoods and lies?

Earlier you were calling the POTUS a socialist and communist, and now your saying he is aligned with an Ultra-Conservative. What gives with the 180?

Seems to me the past president (a conservative) had more in common with Hitler (ultra conservative) than the current (liberal).

From Edward Jayne (not someone pretending to be somebody they are not to dupe readers):

1. Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.

2. Like Hitler, Bush began to curtail civil liberties in response to a well-publicized national outrage, in Hitler's case the Reichstag fire, in Bush's case the 9-11 catastrophe.

3. Like Hitler, Bush went on to pursue a reckless ultra-nationalist foreign policy without the mandate of the electorate.

4. Like Hitler, Bush has accordingly improved his popularity ratings, especially with veterans and conservative Republicans, by mounting an aggressive public relations campaign against foreign enemies. Just as Hitler cited international communism to justify Germany's military buildup, Bush uses Al Qaeda and the Axis of Evil to justify our current military buildup.

5. Like Hitler, Bush promotes militarism while in the midst of a major economic recession (or depression). He uses war preparations to help subsidize defense industries (Halliburton, Bechtel, etc.) and presumably the rest of the economy on a trickle-down basis.

6. Like Hitler, Bush glorifies patriotism to stir up public support. He treats our nation's unique historic destiny almost as a religious cause sanctioned by God.

7. Like Hitler, Bush quickly makes and breaks diplomatic ties, and he makes generous promises that he soon abandons, as in the case of Mexico, Russia, Afghanistan, and even New York City.

8. Like Hitler, Bush envisages a future world order that guarantees his own nation's hegemonic supremacy rather than cooperative harmony under the authority of the United Nations (or League of Nations). He is willing to break the U.N. Charter in promoting this end.

9. Like Hitler, Bush scraps international treaties, most notably the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Convention on the Prohibition of Land Mines, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Kyoto Global Warming Accord, and the International Criminal Court.

10. Like Hitler, Bush depends on an axis of collaborative allies, which he describes as a "coalition of the willing," to give the impression of having a broad popular alliance. These include the U.K. as compared to Mussolini's Italy, and Spain and Bulgaria as compared to, well, Spain and Bulgaria, both of which were aligned with Germany during the thirties and World War II.

11. Like Hitler, Bush possesses a war machine much bigger and more effective than the military capabilities of other nations. Today, Bush depends on a "defense" budget roughly equivalent to the combined military expenditures of the rest of the world.

12. Like Hitler, Bush is willing to invade other nations despite the opposition of the U.N. (League of Nations). He also has no qualms about bribing, bullying and insulting its members, even tapping their telephone lines.

13. Like Hitler, Bush pursues war without cutting back on the peacetime economy. He actually seeks to reduce taxes while conducting an expensive invasion and occupation of an "undesirable" nation.

14. Like Hitler, Bush launches unilateral invasions on a supposedly preemptive basis. Just as Hitler convinced the German public to think of Poland as a threat to Germany in 1939, Bush wants Americans to think of Iraq as a "potential" threat to our national security.

15. Like Hitler, Bush is willing to inflict high levels of bloodshed, with many thousands of casualties anticipated in Iraq, especially since the city of Baghdad--with a population of between 5 and 6 million--will be a primary target.

16. Like Hitler, Bush depends on a military strategy that features a "shock and awe" blitzkrieg beginning with devastating air strikes, then an invasion led by heavy armor columns.

17. Like Hitler, Bush is perfectly willing to sacrifice life as part of his official duty, as indicated by his unique record as a governor of Texas who was reluctant to commute death sentences.

18. Like Hitler Bush began warfare on a single front (Al Qaeda quartered in Afghanistan), but then expanded it to a second front with Iraq, only to be confronted with North Korea as a potential third front. Much the same thing happened when Hitler expanded German military operations from Spain to Poland and France, then was distracted by Yugoslavia before invading the USSR in 1941.

19. Like Hitler, Bush has no qualms about imposing "regime change" by installing Quisling-style client governments reinforced by full-scale military occupation under a military governor.

20. Like Hitler, Bush curtails civil liberties and depends on detention centers (i.e. concentration camps) such as Guantanamo Bay.

21. Like Hitler, Bush repeats lies often enough that they come to be accepted as the truth. Bush and his spokesmen argue, for example that every measure has been taken to avoid war (hardly true), that an invasion of Iraq will diminish (not intensify) the terrorist threat to the world, and that the U.S. is staging an invasion because the risks of inaction would be greater (not less). All of this is highly debatable. They likewise argue that Iraq is linked with Al Qaeda (which has yet to be proven), and that nothing whatsoever has been achieved by U.N. inspectors to warrant the postponement of U.S. war plans (which simply isn't true). They insist that Iraq hides numerous weapons it does not possess as well

as can be determined by U.N. inspectors, and they refuse to acknowledge the total absence of any nuclear weapons program in Iraq since the late nineties. As perhaps to be expected, they indignantly accuse everybody else of deception and evasiveness.

22. Like Hitler, Bush incessantly finds new excuses to justify war—from Iraq's WMD threat to the elimination of Saddam Hussein, to his supposed Al Qaeda connection, to the creation of democracy in the Middle East as a model for neighboring states, and back again to the WMD threat. As soon as one excuse for war is challenged, Bush shifts to another, but only to shift back again at another time.

23. Like Hitler Bush and his cohorts exaggerate ruthlessness by their enemies in order to justify their own. Just as Hitler cited the threat of communist violence to justify even greater violence on the part of Germany, the Bush team justifies a full-scale invasion of Iraq by emphasizing Saddam Hussein's crimes against humanity that were for the most part committed when Iraq was a client-ally of the U.S., supplied with both advisors and materiel (poison gas included) by our own government.

24. Like Hitler, Bush's Messianic ambition to bring about America's hegemonic dominance in the world makes him perhaps the most dangerous President in our nation's history, a rogue chief executive capable of waging any number of illegal preemptive wars.

25. Like Hitler, Bush has become so obsessed with his vision of a Manichaean conflict between good (U.S. patriotism) and evil (the anti-patriotic "other") that for many in contact with the White House he is beginning to seem as if he has lost touch with reality.

26. Like Hitler, Bush takes pleasure in the mythology of frontier justice. As a youth Hitler read and memorized the western novels of Karl May, and Bush retains into his maturity his fascination with simplistic cowboy values. He also exaggerates a cowboy twang despite his elitist education at Andover, Yale and Harvard.

27. Like Hitler, Bush misconstrues evolutionary theory, in Hitler's case by treating the Aryan race as being superior, in Bush's case by rejecting science for fundamentalist creationism.
 
How is Snopes liberal you ask. Well for starters they say false to any bad reports about liberals and say true to any bad reports about Republicans. I use to go to Sopes a lot until I saw the trend. Just like the liberal news media. The bias is right in your face if you open your eyes.

Comparing Bush to Hitler now that is funny right there. This did not even come up until your messiah was accused of working like Hitler.
To say that Bush is a conservative is a big stretch but to say Hitler was an ultra conservative is well totally rediculous.

Now I see that you have done like most liberals have with the name calling. Go for it but I will tell you that I have neither lied nor told any falsehoods. You are going to have to come up with something better than Snopes.
 
Cheez you are off your rocker. Snopes is liberal haha, whatever. Quit believing the propaganda.

So if Hitler wasn't an ultra-conservative, what was he?
 
I would be far more comfortable with having children pray for my president than for them to elevate him above what he is. Huge difference especially since the Bush video is at a Christian camp and not a publicly funded school.

Nice try R14. Looks like you are getting desparate to me.
 
R14 - 9/24/2009 8:00 PM

Cheez you are off your rocker. Snopes is liberal haha, whatever. Quit believing the propaganda.

So if Hitler wasn't an ultra-conservative, what was he?

Well other than the fact that the Ultra Conservatives here in America adore him, i.e., aryan brotherhood, KKK, Neo-Natzi's and etc., to compare Obama to hitler, or Bush is ridiculus, but R14 I understand the point I think you were trying to make to Cheez. I think this all reminds me of when Clinton was in office. Go to any gun show in early to mid-ninties and you could get the bumper sticker.
 
foodsaver - 9/25/2009 7:14 AM
While I believe quite a bit of whats listed there from time to time I find it to not give the whole truth when the whole truth reinforces a conservative view.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_12_18/ai_84396670

Your linked op-ed piece is not really definitive. Yeah so they found 4 cases where snopes could be questioned, 4 out of thousands. I don't think less than 1% really make it a liberal or not. There are other websites that debunk propaganda (truthorfiction.com), I guess they are all liberal too.

Back to the topic of David Kaiser, from David Kaiser's blog:
http://historyunfolding.blogspot.com/

It has also been false credit to Tim Wood and others.
 
4 examples that are highly questionable. When presented with factual information to support changing the information on snopes they refused to make changes. I get that mistakes are going to be made however if you are in the business of debunking myths don't you think you have an obligation to correct any mistakes that are brought to your attention. Also there were several thousand links on google concerning snopes bias. I picked out one as I didn't really think you would like a list of thousands. While I haven't read all of them I was able to find several that included similar stories about different cases.
 
foodsaver - 9/25/2009 11:03 AM

4 examples that are highly questionable. When presented with factual information to support changing the information on snopes they refused to make changes. I get that mistakes are going to be made however if you are in the business of debunking myths don't you think you have an obligation to correct any mistakes that are brought to your attention. Also there were several thousand links on google concerning snopes bias. I picked out one as I didn't really think you would like a list of thousands. While I haven't read all of them I was able to find several that included similar stories about different cases.

Craig it would not matter if you listed all of the proof. Some liberals just refuse to see.
 
To be fair the same can be said for some conservatives. Both sides have their problems. I think the founding fathers would be physically ill if they knew what the country has become and that is as much the fault of the conservatives as it is the liberals. Maybe more so for not getting back to our fiscally conservative, morally righteous roots. The reason Palin was so popular is that she actually believed in fiscal responsibility and morally right values. I am sick to my stomach at the garbage that both sides of Washington have crammed down our throats.
 
foodsaver - 9/25/2009 11:03 AM

4 examples that are highly questionable.

Questionable, not definitive. Only 4 out of thousands, that half a percent is such a huge bias.
 
Bush was an idiot. Obama seems bad if not worse. I, as well as 90% of other folks don't need to see all of the links and crap you guys post to know Bush and Obama both seem to be idiots. I can't even start to talk about Nancy Pelosi. I get mad when I even see her!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top