whenwegoin
Well-known member
Before I got a chance to reply. Darn.
elwestb:
My point about the 4 vs. 11 lber and fertility is that the 11 lber is not as fertile as a 4 lber. I think most of us agree to that. Data (science) has pretty much proven that. So in a sense to most anglers keeping (harvesting) a 4 lber should be considered worse than keeping (harvesting) an 11 lber. I know it doesn't make sense to a tournament minded angler because they want a chance at every 11 pounder that swims in the lake. But that 11 lber once was 4 lbs and 3 and 2 and 5 and 6 and 7 and 8 and 9 and 10 with the SAME BIG FISH DNA as it has as an 11 pounder.
And you made this statement: "I don't know of any tournaments or trail that doesn't take extreme measures and precautions to keep the fish alive for release."
Well I think I do and again there is enough scientific data to support it. EVEN CHURLY ADMITTED TO TRYING TO GET THE 12 HOUR NIGHT TOURNAMENT DOWN TO 11. So that is a clue that this certain tournament trail (I'll never mention it by name again) may or may NOT be "taking extreme measures and precautions to keep the fish alive for release".
Come on people, if it really is about keeping the fishery going for our kids and grandkids you HAVE TO SEE THIS POINT.
For as long as I am not banned from CFF (which may not be for much longer!) whenever someone who fishes tournaments says it is bad for the fishery to harvest an 11 lb or any bass for that matter; I will also say it is bad for the fishery to hold long tournaments and several during hot months and spawning periods. If that is "tournament bashing" then so be it.
Churly, I do apologize to you because I did not know you tried to reduce the hours.
All:
I do appreciate all those anglers who do see the need in limiting tournament hours and numbers during the hottest time of the year.
I do appreciate those tournament anglers who think the 3 fish limit is best for our great fishery.
I do appreciate those awesome "catch and release" anglers.
I appreciate all the replies from everyone on "the" thread to back up the true cause of conservation. The ones who aren't afraid to say what is good and bad for the fishery.
I am truly impressed that dusty, audioman166, from Ringgold GA hence probably why he uses GAfisherman as his CFF handle figured out my first name. I do appreciate his invite to meet him. Such a nice guy. No, really, I'm sure he is.
My best "internet hero" post had to be the PM I sent to fishinmagician today concerning tournament mortality.
Before I get banned from the site I would love to share it with the world if fishinmagician would give his permission.
If I do get banned first, I will ask fishinmagician to share it....
Then...just maybe....my status....could get upgraded....from...internet hero.....to....an....INTERNET GOD!!
Just a few more closing remarks:
Bbass, it was ok that you once ate a smallmouth bass. Showing a picture of the filet knife in it on here showed some big ole nads dude!! Or should that be little ole brains? LOL
JMax, keep up the good work and good posts during times/threads like the one that caused all this. Not sure if all that mess was true about you "bugging someone's row" (as we say in Big Soddy) or not but if you did get too close, shame on you.
Drumking, CU, WolfteverK, RSimms and all the other regular crappie anglers. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
BPrice, I've always enjoyed your posts.
Catjuggin, I can't stand snakes either. I don't even like to get close enough to them to kill them. Does that make me a wimp?
Oh, and the last time I checked I wasn't a ****. That is, if I even know what a **** is.
This post is way too long. No one will read it..and that is most likely a good thing.
elwestb:
My point about the 4 vs. 11 lber and fertility is that the 11 lber is not as fertile as a 4 lber. I think most of us agree to that. Data (science) has pretty much proven that. So in a sense to most anglers keeping (harvesting) a 4 lber should be considered worse than keeping (harvesting) an 11 lber. I know it doesn't make sense to a tournament minded angler because they want a chance at every 11 pounder that swims in the lake. But that 11 lber once was 4 lbs and 3 and 2 and 5 and 6 and 7 and 8 and 9 and 10 with the SAME BIG FISH DNA as it has as an 11 pounder.
And you made this statement: "I don't know of any tournaments or trail that doesn't take extreme measures and precautions to keep the fish alive for release."
Well I think I do and again there is enough scientific data to support it. EVEN CHURLY ADMITTED TO TRYING TO GET THE 12 HOUR NIGHT TOURNAMENT DOWN TO 11. So that is a clue that this certain tournament trail (I'll never mention it by name again) may or may NOT be "taking extreme measures and precautions to keep the fish alive for release".
Come on people, if it really is about keeping the fishery going for our kids and grandkids you HAVE TO SEE THIS POINT.
For as long as I am not banned from CFF (which may not be for much longer!) whenever someone who fishes tournaments says it is bad for the fishery to harvest an 11 lb or any bass for that matter; I will also say it is bad for the fishery to hold long tournaments and several during hot months and spawning periods. If that is "tournament bashing" then so be it.
Churly, I do apologize to you because I did not know you tried to reduce the hours.
All:
I do appreciate all those anglers who do see the need in limiting tournament hours and numbers during the hottest time of the year.
I do appreciate those tournament anglers who think the 3 fish limit is best for our great fishery.
I do appreciate those awesome "catch and release" anglers.
I appreciate all the replies from everyone on "the" thread to back up the true cause of conservation. The ones who aren't afraid to say what is good and bad for the fishery.
I am truly impressed that dusty, audioman166, from Ringgold GA hence probably why he uses GAfisherman as his CFF handle figured out my first name. I do appreciate his invite to meet him. Such a nice guy. No, really, I'm sure he is.
My best "internet hero" post had to be the PM I sent to fishinmagician today concerning tournament mortality.
Before I get banned from the site I would love to share it with the world if fishinmagician would give his permission.
If I do get banned first, I will ask fishinmagician to share it....
Then...just maybe....my status....could get upgraded....from...internet hero.....to....an....INTERNET GOD!!
Just a few more closing remarks:
Bbass, it was ok that you once ate a smallmouth bass. Showing a picture of the filet knife in it on here showed some big ole nads dude!! Or should that be little ole brains? LOL
JMax, keep up the good work and good posts during times/threads like the one that caused all this. Not sure if all that mess was true about you "bugging someone's row" (as we say in Big Soddy) or not but if you did get too close, shame on you.
Drumking, CU, WolfteverK, RSimms and all the other regular crappie anglers. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
BPrice, I've always enjoyed your posts.
Catjuggin, I can't stand snakes either. I don't even like to get close enough to them to kill them. Does that make me a wimp?
Oh, and the last time I checked I wasn't a ****. That is, if I even know what a **** is.
This post is way too long. No one will read it..and that is most likely a good thing.