:emoticon: I see no solution in sight. The issue is and always has been the problem of who has the right to put one on over someone else. How do you determine what tournaments should be allowed and those that should not be allowed. emoScratch Is it going to be a first come first serve bases? Or is it going to be who has done them the longest in the area? Is it going to be based on crowd size of the expected anglers who may participate? Then who is going to be the tournament police? Who is going to ride around checking ramps for tournament violators? The Chick is not Parksville. Over on that lake the size made it more affordable to control it and charge people to have one. What you all keep talking about is easier said then done.
If you start looking at some kind of capacity levels what about just the weekend anglers who want to just going fishing? You going to have some kind of control on that, have folks standing at the ramp telling folks, "Sorry, the lake is full, you will have to come back later." The issue I see here is it seems like everyone has this self thought that the "other guy" should not be able to have a tournament. That their tournament is righteous and correct while the "other guy" is intrusive and wrong. I am not trying to rain on anyone's parade but it will never happen in my opinion. Don't take that wrong, I am not saying I want twenty tournaments a weekend on the Chick, emoDoh , I am just saying that the idea that you can control this in some manner is just not possible. emoGeezer To allow one tournament and not another is a lawsuit in the making. The Parks people could control the number of tournaments going out of their ramps like they do at Chester, but that leaves all other ramps usable for tournaments.
Good luck on this one. Time will tell. emoPolice Jmax