AThornton
Well-known member
RangerRob - 9/3/2008 9:20 PM
team-d - 9/3/2008 9:01 PM
The SEC, Pac 10, Big 10, and sometimes the Big 12 are the superior conferences in the country. They all beat up on each other throughout their conference schedules and in any one year one of them is tops as far as overall strength (even then it's still debatable). This year it has yet to be determined through a pre-season poll and one week of the season. It drives me crazy how most SEC fans feel they have a given right to be the strongest conference every year - fact is, some years yes, some years not. We've already seen what I would say is a 3rd of 4th place Pac 10 team in UCLA beat a 3rd of 4th place SEC team in UT. The only poll that means anything is the one that comes out at the end of the year (and once again, that's still somewhat debatable).
The only difference being that a mid-tier Pac-10, Big 10, Big 12, or ACC school would be a lower-tier SEC school. The Pac-10 has USC, the Big 10 has OSU, and the Big 12 has OK ... and sometimes TX. I'd fear Arkansas, Ole Miss, or South Carolina any day of the week over Purdue, Arizona State, Northwestern, Texas Tech, Stanford, Boston College, or Michigan State. The SEC is just better top to bottom. Even after our win vs. Clemson on Saturday, I still say that Arkansas will be a tougher test for us when we play our first conference game just because they're an SEC team. The other conferences have a Big Dog ... but that's ALL they've got. LSU won a title having lost to ... dare I say ... Kentucky, but they still handed OSU their tails.
Thank you Rob. I agree 100%. How can those conferences be "powerhouses" when they have maybe 2 good teams at most in each conference?? Like I said, the SEC has 8 or 9 teams that could be dominant in other conferences. Take a USC team and put them in the SEC, and take a top SEC team and put them in the PAC, and lets see who has the better season.......