Facts about the peacful Muslims!

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

elwestb

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
6,847
Location
Hooterville or Ooltewah
Subject: The facts

These are the facts...Draw your own conclusions!
A lot of Americans and Canadians have become so insulated from reality that they imagine that America/Canada can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves.

Pause a moment, reflect back.

These events are actual events from history.

They really happened!

Do You Remember?


1. In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed...By a Muslim male.

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred...By Muslim males.

3. In 1972 a Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually diverted to an Arab country where a fuse was lit on final approach and it was blown up shortly after landing...By Muslim males.

4. In 1973 a Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome, with 33 people killed, when it was attacked with grenades...By Muslim males.

5. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over...By Muslim males.

6. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon...By Muslim males.

7. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up...By Muslim males.

8. In 1985, the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair...By Muslim males.

9. In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered...By Muslim males.

10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed...By Muslim males.

11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed the first time...By Muslim males.

12. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed...By Muslim males.

13. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon,
and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed...By Muslim males.

14. In 2002, the United States and Canada and others fought a war in Afghanistan...Against Muslim males.

15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and beheaded by---You guessed it---Muslim males.

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? These 15 incidents are merely coincidence. So, to ensure we Americans/Canadians never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile certain people. Absolutely No Profiling!

They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but..............

Leave Muslim Males alone lest they be guilty of profiling.

Have the American/Canadian People completely lost their Minds, or just their Power of Reason?

Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Alreds and other stupid attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart common sense, feel ashamed of themselves--if they have any such sense.

As the writer of the award winning story 'Forrest Gump' so aptly put it, 'Stupid Is As Stupid Does'.
 
Don't forget the elected pres who is from a Muslim background. You can add this to the list. Lol
 
The "Christian" list of death and destruction is much longer. Over the course of history organized religion has been a bad idea.
 
<div>
</div>

outcaster - 10/12/2013 10:01 AM The "Christian" list of death and destruction is much longer. Over the course of history organized religion has been a bad idea.
</p>

We finally agree... with one huge exception. Not Christianity in general but only when Christianity is the Governing Factor of a Country. Most wars throughout History have been fought over the differences in the religions of opposing tribes.</p>

Big Difference... America's Constitution was written to keep the Governing body from influencing any and all religions and even the right to follow no religion. Therefore, there have never been any legal reasons to fight for your rights to practice any religion of your choice up until the rights afforded in the Constitution are being attacked. When Atheists fabricated a Non-existent "Right" there is now reason to fight. The Atheist Lie referred to as "Freedom FROM Religion" Has absolutely no support from anywhere in the Constitution. The Right to choose no Religion does not in any form over-ride the rights of others to openly practice their religion and to have the freedom to express themselves in public. No where in the constitution does it list any restrictions as to where freedom of expression is banned. Specifically no Government locations nor Government functions are listed as a violation for the freedom of expressing your religion. ... Prove me wrong.. ???</p>
 
Muslims think they will take over in a few generations by out numbering us. They have about 7 kids per family while we have about 2. In time, they will control the ballot box. Then, the U. S. will become a muslim nation. Sad, but true.
 
Liveliner - 10/15/2013 11:03 PM

<div>
</div>

outcaster - 10/12/2013 10:01 AM The "Christian" list of death and destruction is much longer. Over the course of history organized religion has been a bad idea.
 </p>

We finally agree... with one huge exception.  Not Christianity in general but only when Christianity is the Governing Factor of a Country.  Most wars throughout History have been fought over the differences in the religions of opposing tribes.</p>

 Big Difference...  America's Constitution was written to keep the Governing body from influencing any and all religions and even the right to follow no religion.  Therefore, there have never been any legal reasons to fight for your rights to practice any religion of your choice up until the rights afforded in the Constitution are being attacked.  When Atheists fabricated a Non-existent "Right" there is now reason to fight.  The Atheist Lie referred to as "Freedom FROM Religion"  Has absolutely no support from anywhere in the Constitution.  The Right to choose no Religion does not in any form over-ride the rights of others to openly practice their religion and to have the freedom to express themselves in public.  No where in the constitution does it list any restrictions as to where freedom of expression is banned.  Specifically no Government locations nor Government functions are listed as a violation for the freedom of expressing your religion. ... Prove me wrong.. ???</p>

This is an easy one David. The First Amendment covers it quite well. Like we both agree, organized religion especially when it infiltrates Govt is a horrible idea. It's a bad idea to have govt involved in religion just as it is a bad idea to have religion involved in govt. But when religious groups fail to change the hearts and minds of the people to their set of beliefs, they seek the Gov't to do it for them. I have a BIG problem with that. That's what is happening now. Women's reproductive rights and gay/lesbian rights are classic examples of this. Back in the early 1900's is was alcohol consumption, and religious driven opposition that brought about The Prohibition Amendment. The first Amendment assures you and me of Religious freedom, and yes freedom from religion especially when organized by the govt and it's agents. The Govt shall not endorse any religion by passing laws and through it's agents. A gov't employee is not permitted to compel others in any religious activity. David, reading some of your posts I think it's safe to assume you have little trust for the Govt. Do you really want Gov't agents (employees) leading prayer and worship or organizing religious activities while acting as a govt official? I certainly don't. Principal, teachers, coaches are all Govt employees (Dept of Ed.) They are not to indoctrinate my kids or compel them to worship or pray. If they do I will have something to say about it. Keeping religion out of all official Govt business, does not deny the religious Rights of anyone. Kids can pray at school anywhere anytime. Gov't officials can worship any way they choose...... they just can't compel others to do so while they are acting on behalf of the Govt. I don't know why that's so hard for so many to understand. I just don't get it.... Republicans/conservatives are always talking about getting the gov't off their backs and out of their lives, but yet want the govt to monitor the womb of every woman, and the sexual orientation of consenting adults. Last time I checked, it is the govt that issues marriage licenses.... not the Church.
 
Almost... No where ever can I find anything that allows the Government to dominate the freedoms of any religion except in any such case that a Religious Practice clearly violates a State law. By the Constitution, The Government can not restrict the freedoms clearly stated to religion and expression. However. Likewise there is nothing that I can find that defines any law that forbids Religious influences upon the government. Understanding the purpose and intent of this provision as the Constitution was being drafted It seems by practice and example that it was meant to be a one way agreement. Proof.. Every thing about the government has always had influences of religion. Money, Oaths to testify in Court, The Oath to be sworn in as President contains "So help me God." ... If the intent was to keep religious concepts away from the Government then please explain why the Government operates on religion principles and sworn oaths on Christianity and always has.. I am most certain you understand how European countries dominated Churches and used the Church to pass down the laws upon the people.. I still wonder why a brand new calendar is not being designed so Atheist, Agnostics and Non-believers will not be forced to continue keeping up with and counting from the recognized day set as the Birth of Christ. The Christian "Year of Our Lord Calendar" is only one of many. That is somewhat hypocritical to discuss how long since Christ when you or anyone is anti Christ. Strange how we worry about overhearing someone pray but we ignore the big issues.
 
Back
Top