whenwegoin - 9/20/2012 1:39 PM
Censorship
MagicMan72 - 9/20/2012 11:20 AM
Does TVA not have to OK it also?
</p>whenwegoin - 9/19/2012 2:39 PM Censorship
</p>MagicMan72 - 9/20/2012 8:53 PM I have nothing against the rich, or the poor, or the red, white, yellow or green, but anyone who doesnt question the use of poison chemicals in our water system cant be thinking straight.
Fishin Fool - 9/19/2012 9:11 AM
The fact is, rich people are the ones driving the effort. If you think fighting an issue because it was started by a certain economic group is being "jealous" then apparently you haven't bothered to read the numerous posts made over the years on this subject. Most middle class people don't own big homes on the lake. They are concerned with working, paying bills, and an occasional trip to the water to fish, and even now that is being threatened by well heeled folks. What is the old saying; the guilty dog barks first? If you have something useful to say about this issue, fine, but to suggest that " you're jealous of some other people's success and are just using this as an excuse to vent your own personal financial frustrations" is stupid.
</p>
</p>
</p>
</p>488.5 - 9/19/2012 7:13 AMHmmmm .... I didn't know that "The Rich" had anything to do with it? Sounds to me like you're jealous of some other people's success and are just using this as an excuse to vent your own personal financial frustrations .......kingcab - 9/17/2012 7:01 PM Agree with Churly,tva does not care what goes into our waterways as long as the rich are happy.Sad we have to live under these conditions.
488.5 - 9/22/2012 4:41 PMThe guilty dog barks first? Is that the best rebuttal you got? And I take offense to your insinuation that I'm stupid. You can come to my house and say that to my face anytime you feel like discussing it. And I'll post anything I like ... anytime I like ... as long as I don't break the forum rules. If you don't like my opinion then either don't read it or else get over it. My response was in reference to the insinuation that you have to be "rich" to own property on the water. I'd prefer to say you have to be SMART to live there. Manage your money correctly instead of buying a new truck or boat every two years, and work your ass off for several years doing a job that your college education allowed you to get. THAT'S how you live on the water. As for the "rich" being behind the spraying ... you gotta be kidding. The NOISY are behind the spraying. Those who bark loudest and know who to call are getting the spraying done. And if it was around my dock preventing my family from enjoying the property that we own, you can bet your last dollar that I'll either talk TVA into spraying it or else I'll eliminate it myself. I didn't purchase property for YOUR enjoyment, nor am I going to allow you to determine what I should or shouldn't do with vegetation around my dock or property. Spraying near homes and private or public docks is necessary. Get over it. If you knew as much as you "THINK" you do ... you'd be one of those "rich" people that you hate so much.Fishin Fool - 9/19/2012 9:11 AM </p>
The fact is, rich people are the ones driving the effort. If you think fighting an issue because it was started by a certain economic group is being "jealous" then apparently you haven't bothered to read the numerous posts made over the years on this subject. Most middle class people don't own big homes on the lake. They are concerned with working, paying bills, and an occasional trip to the water to fish, and even now that is being threatened by well heeled folks. What is the old saying; the guilty dog barks first? If you have something useful to say about this issue, fine, but to suggest that " you're jealous of some other people's success and are just using this as an excuse to vent your own personal financial frustrations" is stupid.
</p>
</p>
</p>
</p>488.5 - 9/19/2012 7:13 AMHmmmm .... I didn't know that "The Rich" had anything to do with it? Sounds to me like you're jealous of some other people's success and are just using this as an excuse to vent your own personal financial frustrations .......kingcab - 9/17/2012 7:01 PM Agree with Churly,tva does not care what goes into our waterways as long as the rich are happy.Sad we have to live under these conditions.
Fishin Fool - 9/22/2012 4:57 PM
Your posts make the case each time you write ........ You actually purchased property on a public lake. The problem is well heeled people that purchase lake front property, want to change the LAKE to suit them, not the general public.
Fishin Fool - 9/22/2012 4:57 PM
Certainly not all lake front property owners, but enough to have caused TVA to take action.
</p>
</p>
</p>
Don't drag TVA into this. They are not spraying! Nor are they paying for it!
Yup far more volume and higher toxicity to the stuff that washes in from land.beetlespin - 9/23/2012 7:29 PM
I bet you all put herbicides on your yards every year. Weed and Feed, crabgrass preventer, etc... Same stuff. Not sprayed directly in the water but it eventually gets there.
It is the most effective time for selective sprays such as 2,4-d (only kills the non-native milfoil). By using it now, it slows the growth in the spring and early summer. While spraying it in mid-summer, the milfoil has time to recover in the fall and have explosive growth in the spring. Also algae blooms in the summer can hamper the effectiveness.MrWiskers - 9/23/2012 8:17 PM
I am confused. Why spray now? .....