First Post From Aqua Services, Inc., The Aquatic Herbicide Application Company

Chattanooga Fishing Forum

Help Support Chattanooga Fishing Forum:

Here are a couple of my comments.
you say..."but the wrong species and too much of any species is a negative for everyone. I can assure you, topped out mats of hydrilla hold very few fish if any, and even kill fish that become trapped in them due to oxygen loss that is very common in areas with too much aquatic vegetation."
While this may be true in some cases, when people think about the best bass fishing lakes in the country, nearly all the top ones are filled with grass. guntersville, okechobee, rayburn, clear lake, etc. there is no doubt that grass translates into better bass habitat and also better fishing. some of the biggest bass that i have ever caught came from flipping jigs into matted up hyrilla on Guntersville lake.

when you talk about lake property owners not being able to use their docks. this is what i dont understand. the areas that were sprayed in chester frost park are shallow, stump filled areas. its not like they are deep docks. they cant run around full throttle in those areas anyway. I guess maybe i am missing something but it seems to me that the grass will tell them where its too shallow to operate a boat at full throttle. especially in these areas as they are full of stumps.

as for the chemicals, I would challenge anyone that thinks they are safe to pour a glass full and to drink it or to consume a small amount of it everyday over the next few years. i would be willing to bet you would end up with some form of cancer. if its so safe that you would allow it in your drinking water, then by all means, put it in your drinking water, but not mine. and you mention all the chemicals that are currently running in the water due to runoff. thats just another reason that we dont need to add anymore chemicals to the mix. unfortunately water treatment facilities in the US dont remove all chemicals from the water. this is evidenced in all the studies where pharmaceutical drugs are found in the water downstream of a waste treatment facility. Often one of these chemicals is estrogen found from birth control pills that is actually causing fish to have both male and female reproductive organs. i have read several studies on this. the chemicals from pesticides are no different. Keep in mind in our area we have TVA and their ash spill, runoff from coal plants, cooling water from nuclear plants, waste water treatment facilities that over the last year have had two major sewage dumps directly into the river, and all the chemical plants that process water and dump it into the river. we dont need anymore chemicals in the water. everyone i know has been affected by cancer in one way or another and most are linked to chemicals or exposure.

Keep in mind that I am also a lake property owner on chickamauga. i have a lot in soddy creek. and i grew up living with my parents inside chester frost park. We would never consider putting chemicals in the water to kill the grass.

with all this said, i respect you for coming on here and tying to clarify things. i just think we will have to agree to disagree. and in the end, its the way you provide for your family, so you should defend it. but your view is from the point of view that this is how you provide for your family and our view is to protect our families. Unfortunately people are so selfish that they only see the benefits of being able to clear grass from around their docks while not being concerned about dumping chemicals in the water that your neighbor drinks.

now that i have said my peace, lets all go fishing.


emoThumbsup emoToast emoToast emoToast emoToast emoToast emoToast
 
troy goldsby - 7/1/2011 11:21 AM

I forgot, I'll get those statistics for you. But just think, it is lake a big sein net with blades, plowing through fish habitat. Many can't escape and thousands die depending on the area harvested or mulched.

Troy

:eek: NOt sure I'm buying this. My grandparents owned lake front property in upstate New York on Owasco Lake. This part of the country is one of the most conservative and environmentally protective places I've ever seen. Lots of country side and its hard to even find a water bottle on the side of any roads. They used these "harvesters" to chop down excessive weeds. True some were surely killed and it makes the normally clear lake muddy for a week or so but the fish numbers didnt seem to be hurting. We would catch some pretty good smallmouth in the days following this weed control because of the baitfish drawn to the scene. If Owasco Lake and the rest of the finger lake region think its the best way to control excessive weeds then I feel the same way. emoAngler
 
Where to start. I guess Guntersville. You are right, some vegetation is great for fish, no argument there. However, in cases like Guntersville, 30% covered in vegetation, it is too much. Even the majority of the fishermen on Guntersville agree. I have worked there for several years and we have a great working relationship with the fishermen there.

To the point of treatment areas, all of them are treated to provide access, maybe a little swimming, but with matted out vegetation 100' from the end of your dock not much recreational boating is going to occur anyway. Lake access is the main goal.

Not sure where to even start on your herbicide section. All I can say is read the previous posts again. These are herbicides and effect plants not animals. As for drinking it, I wouldn't drink anything in a concentrated form. Including the household cleaners that you apply in your house on a daily basis, or clean your dishes with, or spray in your yard. You probably drink chlorinated water on a daily basis, unless you have a well, no complaints there, that I ever hear anyway. I am not going to discuss pharmaceuticals, ash spills, sewage or anything else that I am not involved in, I don't have the time and it is not what I do.

Doesn't matter what your family would or wouldn't do. Other families have the right to make these decisions just like yours does. The products are legal and approved by the EPA, the practice is safe and effective, and all laws are being followed. Different strokes for different folks.

Yes, I defend what I do and yes it provides for my family. However, don't pigeonhole me as someone that is as one dimensional as you propose. I love may family and will provide for them even if it is by another means. The main reason that I write is because I believe the truth is more powerful than rumors, myths, and flat out lies in many circumstances. I know that what I do is safe and effective and is the best approach to the vegetation issue at hand.

Thanks for the post and I look forward to your posts in the future.

Troy
 
Statistics from the state of Florida below. I will post the slide when I am done. Some of this was done by Dr. Bill Haller with the University of Florida.

Fish Lost to Harvesting


Waterbody Location Plant Fish Harvested


Orange Lake Florida Hydrilla 32% yoy / harvest

Halverson Lk* Wisconsin Coontail 25% of fry

Saratoga Lake New York Milfoil 2-8% / year

*22% macro invertebrates harvested

Thanks for the post.

Troy
 

Attachments

  • fish lost to harvesting.pptx
    83.6 KB
Troy,
I read very carefully your statement about the use of herbicides in Lake Chickamauga. Let me thank you for the post, it was certainly brave of you to do so. Having said that, there are several issues that you attempted to "spin" to make things look a good deal better.

1. You mention that most of the herbicides you use were originally used on ground vegetation on farms and so on. Are you aware of the recent concerns of the countries in the EU concerning the use of "round up" on crops there? Round Up was considered for many, many years to be totally safe and was commonly used, yet now that is being called into question. What assurance do you have that these "safe" chemicals you are using won't be considered unsafe as we know more about them? In addition, herbicides that are safe for land use, may not be safe for use in a pond, stream or lake, hence the restrictions on run off. There is a vast difference in a chemical that is contained in soil, versus one in the water. The human body doesn't function on "soil" it is primarily made of water. As another posted mentioned, with all the run off of treated land you refer to, why is it that we have ANY weeds in the water? Something doesn't smell right here. You are treating water with something you claim is safe, but in the years to come, you have no idea how many of those claims will be destroyed, but far too late to undo the damage spraying caused. The use of DDT to control pests was consider totally safe back in the 70's, yet now it is banned on most states. Agent orange was safe to use around our troops. Tobacco was widely touted as a healthy habit before the truth came out. How many drugs are on the market that have to be pulled year after year once the side effects or known? I could cite a thousand examples. Yet we should trust someone that makes a living spraying this stuff into the water? We should trust in the fact that it has been used for years? Chemicals sprayed into water that is used for drinking, and onto fish that we eat isn't something I trust you, or our government to tell me how safe it is. Common sense tells me that not using it is the safe way to go.
2. You mention that oxygen contents in the lakes drop because of vegetation. Isn't the total opposite true? Plants like milfoil consume CO2 and produce oxygen. Certainly there are some types of algae blooms that reduce oxygen, especially during a die off. When you KILL plants you deplete oxygen, not the other way around. Killing plants creates a sludge on the bottom of the lake, reduces oxygen, and increases the over all heat exposure making for a death trap for fish that are in the area. In addition, killing plants allows for wild changes in the PH levels, most of the time lowering them. Ph directly relates to the health of the fishery. In addition, various plants reduce the toxins in the water by using them to grow, such as some of the run off from fertilizers, which reduces algae growth and increases oxygen. Try fishing in our clean, clear waters with the "weeds" in them. You'll see it is not "green" with algae, which WILL kill the fish. Those overheated "mats" you refer to, used to hold some of the best fishing I've ever had back in the early 80's. I can give you several links if you want to verify any of these facts. Here is one from Texas: http://aquaplant.tamu.edu/faq/dissolved-oxygen/
3. I am not sure what you mean when you refer to property taxes being astronomical for lands owners with property on the water. I also am not sure what you mean by "reduce their property taxes by 50%". Did you mean it decreases VALUE? If you are wanting people to feel sorry for folks that choose to buy property that is assessed at high value and then have to pay taxes on that value, you are barking up the wrong tree. I can assure you that if I bought a home on the lake front, I would expect to pay more in property taxes than someone that bought a house in East Lake. I certainly don't feel sorry for wealthy land owners, that build a house on the water, water that has had weeds in it for the past 45 years, and then want to reshape the enviroment to suit them. If you don't like water weeds, ducks, geese, fishermen, fish, willow flies, herons, birds, etc.....then DON'T buy land on the water. I am amazed at the number of people that admire a mountain, want to build a house on it, then they want to cut all the trees on that very mountain so they can see the view, destroying the one thing that made it a beautiful mountain!!! Sure these folks need to be able to get to the docks they have, but most are going overboard and it sounds like your "TRPOARMA" is simply making an attempt to organize and go even further overboard. I think it is time that fishermen team up with some opposition and form a statewide group opposing your company, this group, and the politicians that kowtow to the wealthy land owners.
4. Finally, the amount of vegetation on the Chick is about 20 times LESS than it was in the late 70's. 20 times less. You were just being born during that time. You didn't fish the lake, but many of us older people did and we know what a paradise it was. We also know what it became after folks said the same things you are saying; "it's safe", "it doesn't harm the fish", and the ever so popular......"trust me". A lot of the stuff you claimed was just smoke and mirrors. Ask anyone on this forum how many bass they have seen "trapped" in the weeds. if you really believe that, you under estimate the fish in our area.



http://ezinearticles.com/?Dangers-of-Aquatic-Herbicides-For-Lakefront-Property-Owners&id=4566350

http://www.ehow.com/list_6687990_aquatic-herbicide-dangers.html
 
emoApplause emoApplause emoApplause well said.until enough people stand up up against this crap it will continue.(nation wide)
 
i am not the smartest guy on here but i would like to see a nation wide petition started on this to let the people we put in office know what we think about our water and how it is being treated.
 
"No longer in use". How do you know you won't be saying that to another group of concerned fishermen in 10 years about the products you are using NOW?




troy goldsby - 7/1/2011 1:33 PM

Once again that is no longer in use. Our products are EPA approved. Can't say much else.

Troy
 
I looked up a few of these. warning labels on all of them. here are a couple.

fluridone is associated primarily with changes in the liver, reduced body weight, and reduced food consumption. While there is no indication that fluridone causes birth defects, adverse effects in pregnant animals exposed to fluridone included reduced food consumption and reduced body weight, associated with an increased incidence of fetal mortality.

This is from the label of aquathol super k
TOXIC If ingested or inhaled. TOXIC in contact with skin.
CORROSIVE Causes irreversible eye damage.
ECOTOXIC to Terrestrial Vertebrates, Aquatic Life and Soil Life.
ENVIRONMENTAL WARNING:
VERY TOXIC TO AQUATIC LIFE. TOXIC TO FISH: AQUATHOL SUPER K®1 is not toxic to fish at
recommended herbicidal rates, however de-oxygenation of water may occur from decay of dense
weed beds. This loss of oxygen may harm aquatic life, particularly fish. This risk is greatest in enclosed,
still, nutrient rich waters with a high proportion of weed. In such cases treat not more than 25% of the
volume of the waterbody at any time and wait 7 days between treatments.
AQUATHOL SUPER K may affect the ability of migrating freshwater fish to become salt tolerant
seagoing fish. Avoid use in water ways that are close to estuarine bodies of water when fish are
migrating.
VERY TOXIC TO TERRESTRIAL PLANTS. AQUATHOL SUPER K is not deactivated by soil, clay and
organic particles and it may move in waterways. Allowance must be made for this when determining
the ‘APPLICATION AREA’ and where water may be taken. Toxic to terrestrial vertebrates.
HEALTH WARNING: TOXIC may be fatal if swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Presumed
to cause damage from repeated oral exposure at high doses to liver, kidneys and gastrointestinal tract.
This product is corrosive and may cause eye damage.
Symptoms of poisoning: Severe eye irritation. Breathing difficulties, followed by convulsions
here is the link... http://www.elliottchemicals.co.nz/documents/aquathol-superk-11.34-EL140.pdf
 
No Spin Here. Just the facts, I can't help it if you don't like them.

1. We are not part of the EU and I certainly trust our scientists more than those in any other countries. We are far and away the best county for testing and approving safe herbicides. Don't know how else to tell you but many of the terrestrial herbicides have the same active ingredients as aquatic herbicides. There are 2 sides to the DDT story and millions have died because of malaria that is no longer controlled by killing mosquitos with DDT. These products aren't pharmaceuticals or drugs, don't understand the comparison. Herbicides kill plants not animals.

2. You should check your facts before you jump into something that you are incorrect about. Please study plant physiology or talk to a botanist before you make claims that are untrue. Plants respire just like you and I. Yes, they utilize carbon dioxide to produce oxygen, but they also take in oxygen. So, when they produce small amounts, on hot cloudy days and at night, they take in more oxygen than what they produce. In thick areas of vegetation, this oxygen consumption from plants leads to fish mortality due to low oxygen levels. Yes, killing too much vegetation will also drop oxygen levels due to decomposition, but we aren't killing too much. Your links are fine, just don't let emotion distort the facts.

3. Many lake front property owners pay 10 times the amount of property taxes as inland folks, I don't think that is equitable, you may. And yes, property values, because of vegetation, can drop as much as 50%, but their property taxes don't follow suit. The last time I looked, and I look a lot, topped out vegetation only decreases the esthetics of a reservoir, those mats are actually quite ugly. They are breeding grounds for disease and mosquitos. As for the TRPOARMA, it is becoming a great organization and will be for years to come and will provide quality aquatic resource management education to all of those interested.

4. My claims are not smoke and mirrors. Only facts. The only misinformation being posted is from you.

Troy
 
Because they are tested, retested, and tested again and they are safe. EPA approved. Don't know how else to tell you.

Troy
 
Aqua Services, Inc. applies the products and we are bound by the label and regulated by the TDA, TDEC, and EPA. We follow the law. Anyone applying without a applicators license is in violation of the law. We are bound by the law.

Troy
 
Glad you posted a label. It is good for all to read those. Let's post some others also. Put up one of clorox, windex, or any other household products. Once again, the products are safe but need to be handled properly.

Troy
 
Oh, yeah, as for opposing our company on a statewide basis, you should see our clients list. There are many avid fisherman that love what we do. We are good at what we do, we are safe and scientific, and so is the practice.

Troy
 
1. No we aren't part of the EU but we certainly can learn from other folks can't we? If you think there are two sides to the DDT story then you didn't see the impact as far as birth defects in children, death of wildlife, impacts on wildlife or you have chosen to ignore it, which the latter is probably true. If you can't see the comparison then you obviously aren't paying attention. We are told time and time and time again, by folks just like you, that this stuff is "safe", when many, many times and countless costs later it proves not to be. It doesn't matter if it is a herbicide, a pesticide, a drug, or whatever. The point is, just because someone makes money dispensing it, with government approval, doesn't make the claims that it is safe stick. You must have missed the point.

2.Plants do consume more oxygen at night. That is fact. But killing plants depletes oxygen period. It is also allows more sunlight and heat to reach the water, allowing for more algae blooms, again, fact. As far as "we aren't killing too much", who decides what is too much? You? The same person that thinks DDT might have been a good thing?

3. I think the taxes we all pay are too damn high, but if I pay my share for where I live, at the assessed rate of my value should I sell, why shouldn't lake front owners, which much more valuable land pay more? Did they think they'd pay LESS? Sounds like your problem is with taxes being too low on inland folks as you call them. But then again, we aren't paying for spraying are we? We just like fishing and that doesn't pay the bills.

4. Maybe you think I posted misinformation. I don't think so.
 
And yes, property values, because of vegetation, can drop as much as 50%, but their property taxes don't follow suit.

Can you please tell me where the lake lots are that have dropped in value 50% due to grass? I spent years looking for a lot on the water before I purchased mine and let me tell you that i never saw one priced 50% lower. and i looked from logan martin lake all the way up to watts bar. they are at a premium price around here. i promise you that. the only ones that were even remotely cheaper are the ones that are so steep you would have to have 1000 steps down to the water and even most of them were over $200k for less than an acre.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top